[ruby-core:25903] Re: Fate of Win32API.rb?

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:14 PM, U.Nakamura <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> In message "[ruby-core:25883] Re: Fate of Win32API.rb?"
>     on Oct.01,2009 22:24:04, <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > Is it valid to assume that registry.rb, sspi.rb, resolv.rb from
> ext/dl/win32/lib/win32 will remain in 2.0 as they (except for sspi.rb which
> currently requires Win32API) all "require dl/import" rather than Win32API?
>
> I don't know why you stick to not "dl" but "dl/import".
> Anyway, those libraries which require "Win32API" are listed on
> my To-Do list.
>
>
I don't understand your response.  My apologies if I asked an unclear
question and I will try to rephrase.  If my question is still unclear,
someone fluent in both Japanese and English please clarify.

In the current snapshot.tar.bz2, registry.rb and sspi.rb have been changed
to use "require dl/import" rather than "require Win32API" as in 1.9.1p243.
I obviously did not make these changes.

Since both registry.rb and sspi.rb no longer require Win32API, is the
current plan to keep the 1.9.2 versions of registry.rb and sspi.rb as part
of 2.0's stdlib?

Thank you,
Jon