[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:26268] [Bug #2261] lib/matrix: following the extensive changes

From: Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-10-24 06:34:00 UTC
List: ruby-core #26268
Bug #2261: lib/matrix: following the extensive changes
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2261

Author: Marc-Andre Lafortune
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Assigned to: Keiju Ishitsuka, Category: lib, Target version: 1.9.2
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-10-24 trunk 25452) [x86_64-darwin10.0.0]

(a) Shouldn't r25412 (and other related commits) be also applied to the 1.8 branch?

(b) r25412 introduced Matrix#inspect_org. It is not documented.

Its output relies on the way the matrix information is stored internally by the Matrix class. Shouldn't this be considered implementation details and thus subject to change and not for public consumption?

It should either:
- be removed,
- be made private (although it is not used by the implementation) or
- be documented

I recommend the first option

(c) #compare_by_row_vectors and #compare_by should either:
- be removed (they are not used by the implementation anymore),
- be made private or
- be documented.

I recommend the first option


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next