[#25897] Mail archive searching? — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
Why does ruby-dev's official archive
[#25928] Ruby 1.8.6-p383 hangs in dln_load on Snow Leopard — Timothy Hunter <cyclists@...>
An RMagick user reports that Ruby 1.8.6 hangs when requiring RMagick.
On Oct 3, 2009, at 4:26 PM, Timothy Hunter wrote:
On Oct 3, 10:26m, Timothy Hunter <cycli...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>
Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that
2009/10/6 Tony Arcieri <tony@medioh.com>:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Yugui <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:
[#25964] mis filed bug reports — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
If i accidentally file a bug under 1.9 that belongs in 1.8, I assume I
[#25965] [Bug #2180] request: add *Method#source_location to 1.8.x — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2180: request: add *Method#source_location to 1.8.x
[#25969] [Bug #2181] Segmentation fault for test/drb/* -- possible bug in Marshal/GC — Nikolai Lugovoi <redmine@...>
Bug #2181: Segmentation fault for test/drb/* -- possible bug in Marshal/GC
[#26012] Segfaults after multiple call of ruby_node_run — Christoph Kappel <unexist@...>
[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error
[#26070] [Bug #2201] Process.spawn fails in 1.9.1 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2201: Process.spawn fails in 1.9.1
[#26087] [Bug #2212] Using a Lambda with Inappropriate Arity for Hash#default_proc= — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #2212: Using a Lambda with Inappropriate Arity for Hash#default_proc=
[#26126] The fate of my keyword documentation — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#26200] [Bug #2243] Random instance variables order — Maxim Chechel <redmine@...>
Bug #2243: Random instance variables order
[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>
Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds
[#26232] [Feature #2255] unicode parameters cannot be passed to ruby — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>
Feature #2255: unicode parameters cannot be passed to ruby
[#26237] [Bug #2256] net\ftp.rb failing on implicit cast of Pathname to string — Sai Fujinaro <redmine@...>
Bug #2256: net\ftp.rb failing on implicit cast of Pathname to string
[#26262] [Feature #2260] better access with GC_DEBUG — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Feature #2260: better access with GC_DEBUG
[#26299] Which commit fixed Set#hash (Hash#hash, I assume) between 1.9.1 and 1.9.2? — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...>
Hello, good people of ruby-core.
[#26303] IO.foreach (and friends) effect on $< and $. — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I have a few questions about how the line-by-line IO operations are
[#26336] [Bug #2283] Ruby 1.9.1p243 spinning with 100% CPU; perhaps rb_str_slice_bang-related — Mark Aiken <redmine@...>
Bug #2283: Ruby 1.9.1p243 spinning with 100% CPU; perhaps rb_str_slice_bang-related
[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>
Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine
Issue #2294 has been updated by Anonymous Anonymous.
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#26388] suggestion: gems.ruby-lang.org — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Hi --
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
Hi,
[#26390] [Bug #2303] dl.so segfaults on mingw32 — Nikolai Weibull <redmine@...>
Bug #2303: dl.so segfaults on mingw32
[#26429] [Bug #2313] Incomplete encoding conversion? — Adam Salter <redmine@...>
Bug #2313: Incomplete encoding conversion?
[#26447] [Bug #2316] [BUG] cfp consistency error — Cezary Baginski <redmine@...>
Bug #2316: [BUG] cfp consistency error
[#26458] [Bug #2319] gethostbyname fails in windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2319: gethostbyname fails in windows
[#26459] [Bug #2320] patch to trunk .document to include more readme's etc. — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2320: patch to trunk .document to include more readme's etc.
[ruby-core:25912] [Bug #2172] Enumerable#chunk with no block
Bug #2172: Enumerable#chunk with no block
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2172
Author: Marc-Andre Lafortune
Status: Open, Priority: Low
Assigned to: Yukihiro Matsumoto, Category: core
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-10-03 trunk 25203) [x86_64-darwin10.0.0]
What should "(1..3).chunk" (i.e. without a block) do?
It issued an
ArgumentError: tried to create Proc object without a block
I changed the error message to "no block given" which I hope to be more informative, but maybe there is something more useful to do here?
A default block of {|x| x} doesn't seem all that useful.
Returning an enumerator that, upon completion, will return an enumerator would probably be better, but could also be a bit confusing if someone doesn't realize he forgot to specify the block?
Thanks to Run Paint for raising the question when writing the rubyspec for #chunk.
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org