[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:26078] Re: [Bug #2203] Call to a removed method doesn't raise an exception

From: Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...>
Date: 2009-10-14 01:08:11 UTC
List: ruby-core #26078
Sorry for duplicates of this bug report - the web site sometimes responds only after a few refreshes.

Tomas

-----Original Message-----
From: Tomas Matousek [mailto:redmine@ruby-lang.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 5:41 PM
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-core:26075] [Bug #2203] Call to a removed method doesn't raise an exception

Bug #2203: Call to a removed method doesn't raise an exception
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2203

Author: Tomas Matousek
Status: Open, Priority: High
ruby -v: ruby 1.8.6 (2009-03-31 patchlevel 368) [i386-mingw32]

obj = Object.new

s = class << obj
  alias_method :rt, :respond_to?
  self
end

p obj.methods(false)             # [:rt]
p obj.rt(:bar)                   # returns false as expected
s.send(:remove_method, :rt)      # removes :rt method
p obj.methods(false)             # []
obj.rt(:foo)                     # this should raise an exception but it doesn’t




D:\temp>ruby19 -v a.rb
ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i386-mswin32] [:rt] false []

D:\temp>ruby -v a.rb
ruby 1.8.6 (2009-03-31 patchlevel 368) [i386-mingw32] ["rt"] false []


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org


In This Thread

Prev Next