[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:26157] Re: RTypedData type unavailable to gdb?

From: Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Date: 2009-10-19 02:35:52 UTC
List: ruby-core #26157
Hi,

At Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:41:05 +0900,
Joshua ben Jore wrote in [ruby-core:26155]:
>   (gdb) p (RTypedData)0
>   No symbol "RTypedData" in current context.

RTypedData is not typedefed nor a pointer.

p (struct RTypedData *)0

> My current script creates a top level function rb_ps which walks down
> from ruby_current_vm down through the living_threads hash and attempts
> to get the rb_thread_t pointers from the RTypedData objects. No such
> luck. Can someone lend some advice to how to proceed here? My OS X
> manual says `nm -a' shows all the symbols but I don't see anything
> that looks like any data type names in there.

Thank you, it seems useful, and I committed fixed version.

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread