[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:26252] Re: [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Date: 2009-10-23 14:17:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #26252
In article <4ae01e9d.1702be0a.4536.7381@mx.google.com>,
  Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> writes:

> IO.for_fd is often dangerous.  Basically, such extension
> libraries should expose IO instances, but not file descriptors.
>
> This is a patch to add :autoclose option to IO.for_fd and
> IO.new.

Another possible idea is reference count on fd.  [ruby-dev:22211]
-- 
Tanaka Akira

In This Thread