[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:25938] Re: Mail archive searching?

From: "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...>
Date: 2009-10-05 08:47:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #25938
Hello Roger,

On 2009/10/02 21:57, Roger Pack wrote:
>> Why does ruby-dev's official archive
>> (http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/ruby/ruby-dev/index.shtml), and all the other
>> 'official' mailing lists, have a search facility, but ruby-core doesn't?
>
> Typically if I google for "ruby core xxx" it gives me the links I want :)
> It might also be searchable through ruby-forum [except their search
> kind of stinks].
> That doesn't answer your question, but anyway :)

Yes. I did a lot of other googling, but always happened to hit things 
such as ruby-debug, or then debugging gdb itself :-(.

>> P.S.: I'm only just trying to find out how to create a version of Ruby that
>> contains debug information (on cygwin). I succeeded to use the -g flag for
>> compilation, but the information gets lost when the .o files get combined
>> into .ar and then shared libraries. Any advice appreciated.
>
> does
> ./configure --enable-shared --disable-install-doc optflags="-O0"
> debugflags="-g3 -ggdb"
> [1] help?
> -r
> [1] http://railsquestions.blogspot.com/2009/01/compiling-ruby-with-debug-symbols-in.html

After fighting a bit with Vista (that's my fault, I admit), this worked 
very nicely.

Thanks a lot,    Martin.

-- 
#-# Martin J. Dst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp

In This Thread