[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:25982] Re: Disabling tainting

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2009-10-07 03:48:47 UTC
List: ruby-core #25982
Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:25981] Re: Disabling tainting"
    on Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:11:57 +0900, Tony Arcieri <tony@medioh.com> writes:

|To really build a secure system around something like $SAFE/taint, you must
|be extremely vigilant with handling the flow of tainted objects through the
|system.  One little mistake anywhere and it doesn't offer you any security
|at all.

As an application security should be perfect.  But in the process of
developing one, detecting even 50% of security issues are using, and I
believe taint system catches far more than 50%.

|> It might not be useful for you but some ruby programs developed on
|> early era often use it.
|
|That's fine, but 99.9% of Ruby programs out there don't use it and it
|impacts performance, so isn't making it an on-by-default configurable option
|a good idea?

Did you say "impacts"?  Do you know how much impact it does for
performance?  I don't buy any performance proposals without
measurement.  I am afraid you cannot measure any difference at all,
when you remove tainting.

							matz.

In This Thread