From: Nikolai Lugovoi <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-10-06T08:30:36+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:25950] [Bug #2171] Kernel#respond_to_missing? Invoked for Unimplemented Methods

Issue #2171 has been updated by Nikolai Lugovoi.


Actually, i pasted wrong patch in previous message. 

This one is working and does not break as much -- using (ex & 0x7F):

--- a/vm_method.c
+++ b/vm_method.c
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ rb_method_boundp(VALUE klass, ID id, int ex)
     rb_method_entry_t *me = rb_method_entry(klass, id);
 
     if (me != 0) {
-	if (ex && (me->flag & NOEX_PRIVATE)) {
+	if ((ex & 0x7f) && (me->flag & NOEX_PRIVATE)) {
 	    return FALSE;
 	}
 	if (!me->def) return 0;
@@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ basic_obj_respond_to(VALUE obj, ID id, int pub)
 {
     VALUE klass = CLASS_OF(obj);
 
-    switch (rb_method_boundp(klass, id, pub|NOEX_RESPONDS)) {
+    switch (rb_method_boundp(klass, id, (pub & 0x7F)|NOEX_RESPONDS)) {
       case 2:
 	return FALSE;
       case 0:

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2171

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org