From: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
Date: 2009-11-02T13:43:52+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:26479] Re: suggestion: gems.ruby-lang.org



On 2009/10/29 9:20, Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Yusuke ENDOH<mame@tsg.ne.jp>  wrote:

> Further down, you suggest:
>
> "Why don't we prepare gems.ruby-lang.org as the default and official
> source of rubygems?  It provides `ruby semi-standard libraries'
> under the following two rules:
>
> - only stable and well-selected gems are put there
>
> - the gems will be tested by the core team before releasing ruby"
>
> This will create more confusion.

Not only that, it will also create more work for the core team. Several 
standard libraries had to be removed because we didn't find maintainers. 
If we can't keep standard libraries in good shape, then I'm not sure we 
can take on the work of taking care of (semi)official gems.

Regards,   Martin.


-- 
#-# Martin J. D�rst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp