[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:26098] [Bug #2216] Command line parameter's order should not be significant

From: Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-10-15 07:53:49 UTC
List: ruby-core #26098
Bug #2216: Command line parameter's order should not be significant
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2216

Author: Vit Ondruch
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-10-07) [i386-mswin32_90]

I would expect that following two examples will have the same result:

c:\>r192vc-w32\bin\ruby.exe -I. -Cc:\temp -e 'p $:'
["c:/", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32_90", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/site_ruby", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32_90",
"c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/1.9.1", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32_90"]

c:\>r192vc-w32\bin\ruby.exe -Cc:\temp -I. -e 'p $:'
["c:/temp", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32_90", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/site_ruby", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32_90", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/1.9.1", "c:/r192vc-w32/lib/ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32_90"]

However, as you can see from the first entry, the result is different. This is confusing behavior.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next