[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:26122] Re: [Bug #2206] lib/delegate: inconsistency between respond_to? and send

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2009-10-16 11:02:38 UTC
List: ruby-core #26122
Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:26080] [Bug #2206] lib/delegate: inconsistency between respond_to? and send"
    on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:06:09 +0900, Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@ruby-lang.org> writes:

|require 'delegate'
|class A
|  private
|    def private_method
|      :bar
|    end
|end
|
|x = SimpleDelegator.new(A.new)
|x.respond_to?(:private_method, true)  # ==> true
|x.send(:private_method)  # ==> NoMethodError

|I expected the call to private_method to be delegated. The attached patch fixes the problem. It is not very elegant but I couldn't think of anything better.

No, delegators should only delegate public methods.  I will make
#respond_to? to warn if you specify true for its optional argument.

							matz.

In This Thread