From: Jon Date: 2009-10-02T23:00:40+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:25904] Re: Fate of Win32API.rb? --001517440f9a3513fe0474f430d0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I don't understand your response. My apologies if I asked an unclear > question and I will try to rephrase. If my question is still unclear, > someone fluent in both Japanese and English please clarify. > > In the current snapshot.tar.bz2, registry.rb and sspi.rb have been changed > to use "require dl/import" rather than "require Win32API" as in 1.9.1p243. > I obviously did not make these changes. > > Since both registry.rb and sspi.rb no longer require Win32API, is the > current plan to keep the 1.9.2 versions of registry.rb and sspi.rb as part > of 2.0's stdlib? > > Thank you, > Jon > > Correction...resolve.rb uses "require dl/import" and sspi.rb still uses "require Win32API" --001517440f9a3513fe0474f430d0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =A0
I don'= t understand your response.=A0 My apologies if I asked an unclear question = and I will try to rephrase.=A0 If my question is still unclear, someone flu= ent in both Japanese and English please clarify.

In the current snapshot.tar.bz2, registry.rb and sspi.rb have been chan= ged to use "require dl/import" rather than "require Win32API= " as in 1.9.1p243.=A0 I obviously did not make these changes.

Since both registry.rb and sspi.rb no longer require Win32API, is the curre= nt plan to keep the 1.9.2 versions of registry.rb and sspi.rb as part of 2.= 0's stdlib?

Thank you,
Jon
=A0

Correction...resolve.rb uses "require dl/import= " and sspi.rb still uses "require Win32API"
--001517440f9a3513fe0474f430d0--