[#4567] Re: What's the biggest Ruby development? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Dave said:

18 messages 2000/08/23
[#4568] Q's on Marshal — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2000/08/23

[#4580] RubyUnit testcase run for different init params? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2000/08/25

[#4584] Re: RubyUnit testcase run for different init params? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/08/25

Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> writes:

[#4623] Re: RubyUnit testcase run for different init params? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2000/08/28

On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#4652] Andy and Dave's European Tour 2000 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

24 messages 2000/08/30
[#4653] Re: Andy and Dave's European Tour 2000 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/08/30

Hi,

[#4657] Ruby tutorials for newbie — Kevin Liang <kevin@...> 2000/08/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:4683] Re: Function argument lists in parentheses?

From: Toby Hutton <thutton@...>
Date: 2000-08-30 23:40:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #4683
matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
> Whether parentheses are required depends on the place where the method
> appear, not the type of it.  The parentheses can be ommitted if no
> ambiguity arise.

Of course, thanks.  I've played around some more and found my cases
must be slightly ambiguous.  Like this:

def func arg
  [0, 1, 2]
end

a, b, c = func "arg"   --> error
a, b, c = func("arg")  --> ok
a, b, c = (func "arg") --> ok

Why doesn't the first form work?  Is it assigning 'func' to 'a' (or
'c'?)  and then coming across '"arg"' and going WTF?
-- 
Toby.

In This Thread