[#4567] Re: What's the biggest Ruby development? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Dave said:

18 messages 2000/08/23
[#4568] Q's on Marshal — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2000/08/23

[#4580] RubyUnit testcase run for different init params? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2000/08/25

[#4584] Re: RubyUnit testcase run for different init params? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/08/25

Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> writes:

[#4623] Re: RubyUnit testcase run for different init params? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2000/08/28

On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#4652] Andy and Dave's European Tour 2000 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

24 messages 2000/08/30
[#4653] Re: Andy and Dave's European Tour 2000 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/08/30

Hi,

[#4657] Ruby tutorials for newbie — Kevin Liang <kevin@...> 2000/08/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:4527] for and multiple assignment?

From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date: 2000-08-21 14:40:01 UTC
List: ruby-talk #4527
Ruby already has mutiple assignment.  Would it be possible to extend
for to allow multiple things to be selected at once?

for p1, p2, p3, result1, result2 in long_list_of_tests do
    mine = My_class.new()
    mine.method1(p1,p2,p3)
    assert_equal(result1, mine.feature1())
    assert_equal(result2, mine.feature2())
end

seems to be more readable to me than:

while long_list_of_tests.length do
    p1 = long_list_of_tests.shift
    p2 = long_list_of_tests.shift
    p3 = long_list_of_tests.shift
    result1 = long_list_of_tests.shift
    result2 = long_list_of_tests.shift
    mine = My_class.new()
    mine.method1(p1,p2,p3)
    assert_equal(result1, mine.feature1())
    assert_equal(result2, mine.feature2())
end

Maybe there is a good reason why this has not been allowed.
	Hugh
	hgs@dmu.ac.uk


In This Thread

Prev Next