[#41581] Ruby 1.6.7 dieing of segfault — Dossy <dossy@...>

I've got something that's fairly reproducible in 1.6.7. Is

11 messages 2002/06/02
[#41582] Re: Ruby 1.6.7 dieing of segfault — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu.nokada@...> 2002/06/02

Hi,

[#41660] dynamic attr_accessor?? — Markus Jais <mjais@...>

hello

16 messages 2002/06/03

[#41755] HTML Parser suggestions wanted — Ned Konz <ned@...>

I've written an HTML parser that builds trees from HTML source. After

13 messages 2002/06/04

[#41809] eval and local variable — "Park Heesob" <phasis@...>

15 messages 2002/06/05

[#41819] mod_ruby and module space — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

It seems that if I execute a script using mod_ruby, I cannot call

18 messages 2002/06/05

[#41867] Pascal-like 'with' statement? — Philip Mak <pmak@...>

Is there something like Pascal's with statement? I'd like to turn this

18 messages 2002/06/06

[#41919] 1-second events — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

I need to create an event that occurs exactly once per second.

15 messages 2002/06/06

[#42086] ANN: REXML 2.3.5 && 2.2.3 — Sean Russell <ser@...>

<posted & mailed>

31 messages 2002/06/09
[#42091] Re: ANN: REXML 2.3.5 && 2.2.3 — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2002/06/09

<posted & mailed>

[#42092] RE: ANN: REXML 2.3.5 && 2.2.3 — <james@...> 2002/06/09

> Well, XMLSchema may be troublesome to interpret, but it isn't

[#42192] ruby-dev summary 17252-17356 — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2002/06/11
[#42290] Re: a new block parameter/variable notation (Re: ruby-dev summary 17252-17356) — Kent Dahl <kentda@...> 2002/06/12

Not wanting to flog a dead horse, but I just wonder what the final word

[#42295] Re: a new block parameter/variable notation (Re: ruby-dev summary 17252-17356) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/06/12

Hi,

[#42455] Application server & web developement enviroment — "Radu M. Obad磚 <whizkid@...>

Howdy,

14 messages 2002/06/14
[#42459] Re: Application server & web developement enviroment — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2002/06/14

On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:55:31 +0900, Radu M. Obadwrote:

[#42472] ANN: Programmierung in Ruby — "Juergen Katins" <katins.juergen@...>

Programmierung in Ruby Online gibt es jetzt mit ausfrlichem

14 messages 2002/06/14

[#42504] Are Unix tools just slow? — Chris Gehlker <gehlker@...>

Awhile back I was asking for help with a unixy way to search the mounted

48 messages 2002/06/14
[#42506] Re: Are Unix tools just slow? — Rick Bradley <rick@...> 2002/06/14

* Chris Gehlker (gehlker@fastq.com) [020614 17:18]:

[#42512] Re: Are Unix tools just slow? — Chris Gehlker <gehlker@...> 2002/06/15

On 6/14/02 3:34 PM, "Rick Bradley" <rick@rickbradley.com> wrote:

[#42513] opengl for ruby, please help — ccos <ccos@...> 2002/06/15

unix newby failing miserably here:

[#42516] Re: Are Unix tools just slow? — "Daniel P. Zepeda" <daniel@...> 2002/06/15

On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:14:38 +0900

[#42507] mpg123 — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2002/06/14

[#42546] File.new('foo', 0600 , 'wb') — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

21 messages 2002/06/15
[#42552] Re: File.new('foo', 0600 , 'wb') — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2002/06/15

Dossy wrote:

[#42591] Kernel#select questions — Wilkes Joiner <boognish23@...>

I'm trying to track down a bug where Kernel#select is returning [[],[],[]] as

12 messages 2002/06/17

[#42617] eRuby on Mac OS X — Jim Menard <jimm@...>

I've searched ruby-talk for this topic, and the only messages I found show

13 messages 2002/06/17

[#42674] REXML in C — "Radu M. Obad磚 <whizkid@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2002/06/18

[#42771] Why is I/O slow? — Clifford Heath <cjh_nospam@...>

Ok, folk, time to try again. It's nothing to do with SHA-1.

61 messages 2002/06/20
[#42831] Re: Why is I/O slow? — Clifford Heath <cjh_nospam@...> 2002/06/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#42836] RE: Why is I/O slow? — "Mike Campbell" <michael_s_campbell@...> 2002/06/21

> With respect, this doesn't sound like a smart idea. The glibc folk have

[#42838] Re: Why is I/O slow? — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...> 2002/06/21

On Thursday 20 June 2002 10:10 pm, Mike Campbell wrote:

[#42839] Re: Why is I/O slow? — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2002/06/21

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:16:24 +0900, Albert Wagner wrote:

[#42928] GOOD DEAL — "DR. ISA BELLO" <dr_isa@...>

FROM:DR ISA BELLO

11 messages 2002/06/22

[#42982] No exceptions from String#to_i — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

I've been bitten by this before... maybe

19 messages 2002/06/24
[#42983] Re: No exceptions from String#to_i — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/24

>>>>> "H" == Hal E Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:

[#42986] Re: No exceptions from String#to_i — Nikodemus Siivola <tsiivola@...> 2002/06/24

[#43122] Re: help (ruby-talk ML) — Benjamin Peterson <bjsp123@...>

20 messages 2002/06/27
[#43123] Re: help (ruby-talk ML) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/06/27

Benjamin Peterson <bjsp123@yahoo.com> writes:

[#43124] RE: help (ruby-talk ML) — Bob Calco <robert.calco@...> 2002/06/27

Yes, I would gladly volunteer considerable effort to this end. I have

[#43147] Ruby on Mac OS X — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

Hi,

24 messages 2002/06/28

[#43174] eruby SAFE question — Dylan Northrup <docx@...>

I'm trying to implement a replacement for the standard apache file listings

39 messages 2002/06/28
[#43249] documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2002/06/30

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#43250] Re: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/06/30

Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> writes:

[#43255] RE: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — <james@...> 2002/06/30

>

[#43280] Re: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — "Juergen Katins" <juergen.katins@...> 2002/07/01

Tobias Reif wrote

[#43282] Re: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2002/07/01

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Juergen Katins wrote:

[#43381] RE: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) — <james@...> 2002/07/02

> From: David Alan Black [mailto:dblack@candle.superlink.net]

Re: OT!!! Are Unix tools just slow?

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>
Date: 2002-06-15 00:53:28 UTC
List: ruby-talk #42510
Mike Hall wrote:


> Even more off thread:  old V7 UNIX had some commands called
> 'icheck' and 'ncheck'.


Just for fun:

----------------------------------------------------------------------

PDP-11/70 Connected...booting...
@boot
New Boot, known devices are hp ht rk rl rp tm vt
: rl(0,0)unix
mem = 177856
# man icheck

ICHECK(1M)          UNIX Programmer's Manual           ICHECK(1M)

NAME
      icheck - file system storage consistency check

SYNOPSIS
      icheck [ -s ]  [ -b numbers ] [ filesystem ]

DESCRIPTION
      Icheck examines a file system, builds a bit map of used
      blocks, and compares this bit map against the free list
      maintained on the file system.  If the file system is not
      specified, a set of default file systems is checked.  The
      normal output of icheck includes a report of

           The total number of files and the numbers of regular,
           directory, block special and character special files.

           The total number of blocks in use and the numbers of
           single-, double-, and triple-indirect blocks and direc-
           tory blocks.

           The number of free blocks.

           The number of blocks missing; i.e. not in any file nor
           in the free list.

      The -s option causes icheck to ignore the actual free list
      and reconstruct a new one by rewriting the super-block of
      the file system.  The file system should be dismounted while
      this is done; if this is not possible (for example if the
      root file system has to be salvaged) care should be taken
      that the system is quiescent and that it is rebooted immedi-
      ately afterwards so that the old, bad in-core copy of the
      super-block will not continue to be used.  Notice also that
      the words in the super-block which indicate the size of the
      free list and of the i-list are believed.  If the super-
      block has been curdled these words will have to be patched.
      The -s option causes the normal output reports to be
      suppressed.

      Following the -b option is a list of block numbers; whenever
      any of the named blocks turns up in a file, a diagnostic is
      produced.

      Icheck is faster if the raw version of the special file is
      used, since it reads the i-list many blocks at a time.

FILES
      Default file systems vary with installation.

SEE ALSO
      dcheck(1), ncheck(1), filsys(5), clri(1)




Printed 9/22/88                                                 1


ICHECK(1M)          UNIX Programmer's Manual           ICHECK(1M)


DIAGNOSTICS
      For duplicate blocks and bad blocks (which lie outside the
      file system) icheck announces the difficulty, the i-number,
      and the kind of block involved.  If a read error is encoun-
      tered, the block number of the bad block is printed and
      icheck considers it to contain 0.  `Bad freeblock' means
      that a block number outside the available space was encoun-
      tered in the free list.  `n dups in free' means that n
      blocks were found in the free list which duplicate blocks
      either in some file or in the earlier part of the free list.

BUGS
      Since icheck is inherently two-pass in nature, extraneous
      diagnostics may be produced if applied to active file sys-
      tems.
      It believes even preposterous super-blocks and consequently
      can get core images.




# man ncheck


NCHECK(1M)          UNIX Programmer's Manual           NCHECK(1M)


NAME
      ncheck  -  generate names from i-numbers

SYNOPSIS
      ncheck [ -i numbers ]  [ -a ] [ -s ]  [ filesystem ]

DESCRIPTION
      Ncheck with no argument generates a pathname vs. i-number
      list of all files on a set of default file systems.  Names
      of directory files are followed by `/.'.  The -i option
      reduces the report to only those files whose i-numbers fol-
      low.  The -a option allows printing of the names `.' and
      `..', which are ordinarily suppressed.  suppressed.  The -s
      option reduces the report to special files and files with
      set-user-ID mode; it is intended to discover concealed vio-
      lations of security policy.

      A file system may be specified.

      The report is in no useful order, and probably should be
      sorted.

SEE ALSO
      dcheck(1), icheck(1), sort(1)

DIAGNOSTICS
      When the filesystem structure is improper, `??' denotes the
      `parent' of a parentless file and a pathname beginning with
      `...' denotes a loop.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tobi

-- 
http://www.pinkjuice.com/

In This Thread