From: lagi@... Date: 2002-06-27T08:52:13+09:00 Subject: Re: Palm Distro This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_006F_01C21D74.DEC15820 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Everyone, I think ANY implementation of Ruby (tiny Ruby anyone ;-) ) would be better than none. whether we have to change a few library routines - who cares. I absolutely prefer it to C now.=20 BTW what about an implementation for Pocket PC? Weiler's Law "Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself." ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Harry Ohlsen=20 To: ruby-talk ML=20 Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:35 AM Subject: Re: Palm Distro On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:59, you wrote: > I have some Palm programming experience. Depending on which compiler > you use, you may or may not have stdio emulated. I've been using > PRC-Tools and this page is really helpful as an overview: > http://tangentsoft.net/palmfaq/articles/stdlib.html I've found that pretty much every standard C library routine I wanted = was=20 available with a slightly different name. For example, StrPrintf() for=20 sprintf(). Hence, a few #define's can get you a long way. Of course, most of the = *nix=20 library routines are missing, but unless they're used by the other code, = that=20 would simply mean that some of Ruby's library routines would have to be=20 sacrificed. ------=_NextPart_000_006F_01C21D74.DEC15820 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable