From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2002-06-11T21:17:38+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby-dev summary 17252-17356

matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

> In case we choose <a,b,c; x,y> form, |a,b,c; x,y| will perhaps be
> available too.

Matz:

I'm not sure I understand why we'd want to change the '|...|' to
"<...>". If we don't need to use '<...>' for lexical reasons, wouldn't
it be better to use '|...|'? That way we'd leave the '<..>' option
free for use for some other purpose in future.

Dave