From: David Alan Black Date: 2002-07-01T09:26:08+09:00 Subject: Re: documentation licenses (was: eruby SAFE question) Hi -- On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tobias Reif wrote: > GFDL [1] says "Preserve all the copyright notices of the Document." I'm not sure this would have impressed Mr. Katins, who does not seem to have much regard for the "preserve this notice" category of license requirements. I base this view on the fact that Katins's translation does not include the following notice, which the OPL stipulates must be included with translations: Copyright (c) by . This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Open Publication License, vX.Y or later (the latest version is presently available at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/). The OPL thus anticipates the case of translations, but through a "preserve this notice" mechanism which Katins evidently found cumbersome and therefore chose to ignore. David -- David Alan Black home: dblack@candle.superlink.net work: blackdav@shu.edu Web: http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav