From: Sean O'Dell <sean@...>
Date: 2002-06-06T03:41:24+09:00
Subject: Re: mod_ruby and module space

Kent Dahl wrote:

> Sean O'Dell wrote:
> 
>>Oh, did I use require in my example...oops.  Yes, I use load, require
>>doesn't work.  The problem isn't loading the module, it's using
>>functions within a module.  When I call functions from one ruby file
>>which has loaded another ruby file, I can't call any module functions in
>>that other ruby file from the first ruby file.
>>
> 
> Well, using those functions worked for me when I loaded the module as an
> .rb file.
> 
> Uhm, not sure what I did, but this works for me:
> 
> # script2.rb # Notice, no X
> module TestMod
> def TestMod::test()
> print("test")
> end
> end
> 
> # > > script1.rbx
> load "script2.rb" # Or require "script2" as suggested by James
> TestMod::test()
> puts  # Without this, Netscape replies "Document contained no data."
> 
> Looks like perhaps some flushing problem in mod_ruby? I get "test" as a
> result by this on my server.
> I'm on ruby 1.6.7 (2002-03-01) [i586-linux], with mod_ruby-0.9.8


Actually, my actual test over here used an .rb file, not an .rbx...but 
it shouldn't make a difference with require/load, eh?

So, you can call module functions in one script file from other script 
files in mod_ruby?  Weird...I wonder what the heck is going on.


	Sean