[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:26175] Re: A challenge: Enumerator#next in JRuby

From: Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
Date: 2009-10-20 00:57:39 UTC
List: ruby-core #26175
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
<headius@headius.com> wrote:
> I ran some benchmarks as well... JRuby's threaded enumerators spin up
> 5-20x times slower than 1.9's, but nowhere near as slow as 1.8.7.
> 1.8.7 seems to be broken it's so bad, and it shoots up to 400-500MB
> during this benchmark:

It's worth mentioning that in both the threaded and lightweight cases,
we've implemented it all in Ruby (with minor modifications to
Enumerator's Java code). So lightweight enumeration in JRuby is nearly
4x faster than 100% native Fiber-based enumeration in 1.9. So the cost
from Fiber-based enumeration is really high.

- Charlie

In This Thread