[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:26064] Re: [Feature #1371] FTPS Implicit

From: Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Date: 2009-10-13 01:19:06 UTC
List: ruby-core #26064
Hi,

2009/10/12 Daniel Parker <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
> Sorry, I don't know all of the requirements for a patch. Can you fix it?
> * OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_NONE is not required, but should be able to be set as an option.

OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_PEER should be used by default for security reasons.
Please see <URL:https://www.isecpartners.com/advisories/2007-006-rubyssl.txt>.

> * document == documentation?

Yes.

> * If any code is exact duplicate, it can be removed; but there are several methods I had to tweak just slightly to get them to work properly with FTPS. (not to be confused with SFTP!)

Could you create a patch for Net::FTP if it is necessary?

I prefer an approach to modify Net::FTP itself to support implicit
(and explicit) FTPS.
Please see Net::IMAP in Ruby 1.9.

-- 
Shugo Maeda

In This Thread