[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:25890] [Bug #2119] 'gem' method has problem when gems are in ~/.gem and no version requirement is given

From: Cezary Baginski <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-10-01 22:26:44 UTC
List: ruby-core #25890
Issue #2119 has been updated by Cezary Baginski.

File patch_gems_in_home.patch added

Here is a patch for gem_prelude.rb:

- if no requirement is given, '>=0' is assumed instead of raising an error (seems reasonable, since many gems do not provide version requirements)

- patch created with 'git diff -b -w --patience gem_prelude.rb > patch_gems_in_home.patch' (for more clarity)

- created against:
 git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@25173 ( SHA1: eeb88c0af45ebb9404be6ea0d4ae3ac164df9e84 )


Issues:

- doesn't break anything AFAIK - test/rubygems/test_*.rb are broken in a few places anyway, but nothing new is broken

- i would normally write a test case or two, but I would prefer feedback first about what the old code was supposed to do
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2119

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread