[#25257] [Bug #2030] Math.gamma(x) seg faults for integer x larger than 2<<63-1 — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>
Bug #2030: Math.gamma(x) seg faults for integer x larger than 2<<63-1
[#25272] [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
Feature #2032: Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original".
Issue #2032 has been updated by Eric Hodel.
Issue #2032 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
Issue #2032 has been updated by Kazuhiko Shiozaki.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Kazuhiko Shiozaki<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
If readline's change in license is the primary reason for reevaluating
Issue #2032 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
Hi,
> To avoid enbugging a new bug, we must choose the another solutions.
2010/6/6 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
(2010/06/06 20:27), Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:12, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
Hi,
On Jun 14, 2010, at 22:48, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#25275] Ruby platform interface — vondruch@...
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:17 AM, <vondruch@amberg.cz> wrote:
Excerpts from message of Wed Sep 02 13:03:22 +0300 2009:
[#25285] [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Feature #2033: Move Core Development to Git
Issue #2033 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
> Some commiter of Ruby live on Windows.
Jon wrote:
2009/9/4 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
2009/9/4 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
The point I suspect that a lot of those pushing for the move to git
On Sep 4, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Eleanor McHugh wrote:
Issue #2033 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:19, Run Paint Run Run wrote:
>> * Opens Ruby development to a wider range of contributors. Ruby- and
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 19:50, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
Short summary:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Ron
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 16:43, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote=
Run Paint Run Run wrote:
Ruby is a basic infrastructure that needs to be stable. If it goes as agile as
[#25306] [Feature #2034] Consider the ICU Library for Improving and Expanding Unicode Support — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Feature #2034: Consider the ICU Library for Improving and Expanding Unicode Support
[#25360] [Bug #2043] incompatible character encodings — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>
Bug #2043: incompatible character encodings
[#25367] [Bug #2048] Thread#raise: Handling of Current Exception — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #2048: Thread#raise: Handling of Current Exception
[#25394] Unmaintained code (Was: Move Core Development to Git) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
On Sep 4, 2009, at 02:16, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
I'll volunteer to maintain delegate.rb.
I'll volunteer to maintain English.rb and tempfile.rb.
I would gladly maintain find, observer & ostruct if that can be of any
I think that one responsibility of maintainers of a component should be
[#25420] [Bug #2054] Onigurma Isn't Documented — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #2054: Onigurma Isn't Documented
[#25442] turning off indentation warnings — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Is there a way in 1.9 to turn off only indentation warnings? I like
Hi,
Hi,
On Sep 22, 2009, at 8:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Aaron Patterson wrote:
>>>> I've looked into adding a global variable. I think it looks better,
[#25506] [Bug #2072] Segmentation faults with libxml-ruby and ruby 1.9.1 — 賢司 高橋 <redmine@...>
Bug #2072: Segmentation faults with libxml-ruby and ruby 1.9.1
On Sep 9, 2009, at 11:05 PM, =E8=B3=A2=E5=8F=B8 =E9=AB=98=E6=A9=8B =
[#25540] [Bug #2095] Oniguruma No Longer Understands Unihan Characters — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #2095: Oniguruma No Longer Understands Unihan Characters
[#25571] Implicit block argument in Procs — Cody Brocious <cody.brocious@...>
I ran into some block behavior I thought was a bit odd. Calling a
[#25587] Minimalist Ruby Install for Windows — Mike Hatfield <oakraven13@...>
Hi everyone,
[#25630] [Bug #2114] Array Hash inconsistency — Wim Yedema <redmine@...>
Bug #2114: Array Hash inconsistency
[#25632] [Bug #2117] Binding to a class, a method from the class's superclass's metaclass, fails — "Shane O'Brien" <redmine@...>
Bug #2117: Binding to a class, a method from the class's superclass's metaclass, fails
[#25634] Kernel.eval("local_variables",binding) bug in Ruby 1.9 — Howard Yeh <hayeah@...>
Hi,
[#25635] [Bug #2119] 'gem' method has problem when gems are in ~/.gem and no version requirement is given — Cezary Baginski <redmine@...>
Bug #2119: 'gem' method has problem when gems are in ~/.gem and no version requirement is given
Issue #2119 has been updated by Cezary Baginski.
[#25644] [Bug #2121] mathn/rational destroys Fixnum#/, Fixnum#quo and Bignum#/, Bignum#quo — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Bug #2121: mathn/rational destroys Fixnum#/, Fixnum#quo and Bignum#/, Bignum#quo
Charles Nutter wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Joel VanderWerf
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:29 AM, brian ford <brixen@gmail.com> wrote:
[#25679] Ruby 1.9 pack('m') and unpack('m') not round tripping — Mikel Lindsaar <raasdnil@...>
Hello all,
[#25681] [Bug #2127] Fiber#resume - segfault inside C extension — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>
Bug #2127: Fiber#resume - segfault inside C extension
[#25709] [Bug #2131] f(not x) => syntax error — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>
Bug #2131: f(not x) => syntax error
Issue #2131 has been updated by James M. Lawrence.
[#25756] syck maintenance? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Has anyone taken this over?
Ryan Davis wrote:
There are about 15 open issues relating to yaml/syck.
[#25764] [Proposal] Maintainer confirmation and discharging process — Yugui <yugui@...>
2009/9/25 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
Hi,
[#25769] A challenge: Enumerator#next in JRuby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I have a challenge for anyone who wants to discuss, propose
For what it's worth, although solution 3 is not very pretty, it could
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
In article <f04d2210909251312q46bd51c0teacc4b0a8c417f0c@mail.gmail.com>,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
In article <f04d2210909252208k4fd66540u54a5d280613bb043@mail.gmail.com>,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#25796] [Bug #2144] Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2144: Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s
[#25820] [Feature #2152] Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Feature #2152: Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s
Issue #2152 has been updated by Roger Pack.
Hi,
Hi,
Issue #2152 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
> Issue #2152 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
Hi,
Hi,
[#25831] event hook in 1.9? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
> /**
Ryan Davis wrote:
[#25841] [ANN] Ruby Developer's Meeting 20091013 — Yugui <yugui@...>
Hi,
[#25853] [Bug #2160] JSON can't parse input where top-level object is a string — caleb clausen <redmine@...>
Bug #2160: JSON can't parse input where top-level object is a string
Issue #2160 has been updated by Tim Bray.
Tim Bray wrote:
[#25865] struggling to convince myself 1.9's constant lookup rules make any sense — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
[#25876] Fate of Win32API.rb? — Jon <jon.forums@...>
Spelunking the ruby-core Nabble archives and Redmine hasn't yet shed any
Hello,
[ruby-core:25859] Re: Method#name behavior
Hi, On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca> wrote: > It is intentional. In Ruby 1.9, method names are always returned as > symbols. Ruby 1.8.7+ returns strings and that can not be changed > because this would not be compatible. Great, thanks for the quick clarification! > Other implementations should do the same, and RubySpec should reflect > that duality (indeed Method#name specs are wrong for 1.8.7, I'll fix > them now). Looks like UnboundMethod#name is affected as well, I've just integrated a fix from a user, similar to your change to Method#name rubyspecs. Thanks, --Vladimir > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@gmail.com> w= rote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> I'd like to ask for clarification about Method#name behavior. This >> comes from rubyspec area. >> >> In MRI 1.8.7, Method#name returns a String. And the ruby-docs says so >> as well. Some time in the past, MRI 1.9 was also =A0returning strings, >> it seems. But then, the behavior in 1.9 has been changed to return a >> Symbol. >> >> So, in short: >> 1. 1.8.7: #name returns strings. #methods returns array of strings. >> 2. 1.9: #name returns symbols. #methods returns array of symbols. >> >> Seems consistent across the same versions. >> Is that how it is supposed to be? >> >> But if we are considering 1.8.7 as a step towards 1.9, maybe the >> behavior should be the same for 1.9 and 1.8.7+ branch? >> >> P.S. For various non-MRI implementations, it seems that some return >> strings, and others return symbols, so it would be good to clarify >> this once and for all. >> >> Thanks, >> =A0--Vladimir >> >> > >