From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2009-09-23T18:26:44+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:25730] Re: [Bug #2131] f(not x) => syntax error

Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:25713] [Bug #2131] f(not x) => syntax error"
    on Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:13:06 +0900, "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> writes:

|This should have been classified as a feature request.
|
|Since (not x) is legal syntax, it is my opinion that f(not x) should be legal.

So, do you mean a,b,c = 1,2,3 is legal syntax, should we allow
f(a,b,c = 1,2,3) ?

In fact, it's matter of precedence, kinda difficult to "fix".

							matz.