[#25272] [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2032: Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original".

51 messages 2009/09/02
[#25368] [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Kazuhiko Shiozaki <redmine@...> 2009/09/04

Issue #2032 has been updated by Kazuhiko Shiozaki.

[#25461] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/09/07

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Kazuhiko Shiozaki<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#25463] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/09/08

Hi,

[#30610] [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/06/06

Issue #2032 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#30611] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/06/06

Hi,

[#30614] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/06/06

> To avoid enbugging a new bug, we must choose the another solutions.

[#30616] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/06/06

2010/6/6 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:

[#30652] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/06/08

(2010/06/06 20:27), Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

[#25285] [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Feature #2033: Move Core Development to Git

75 messages 2009/09/02
[#25290] [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/09/02

Issue #2033 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#25297] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2009/09/02

> Some commiter of Ruby live on Windows.

[#25342] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/09/03

Jon wrote:

[#25343] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/09/03

2009/9/4 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:

[#25345] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/09/03

Michal Suchanek wrote:

[#25299] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/09/02

On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:19, Run Paint Run Run wrote:

[#25306] [Feature #2034] Consider the ICU Library for Improving and Expanding Unicode Support — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Feature #2034: Consider the ICU Library for Improving and Expanding Unicode Support

16 messages 2009/09/03

[#25394] Unmaintained code (Was: Move Core Development to Git) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

On Sep 4, 2009, at 02:16, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

10 messages 2009/09/05

[#25420] [Bug #2054] Onigurma Isn't Documented — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #2054: Onigurma Isn't Documented

17 messages 2009/09/05

[#25442] turning off indentation warnings — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

Is there a way in 1.9 to turn off only indentation warnings? I like

19 messages 2009/09/06
[#25510] Re: turning off indentation warnings — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/09/10

Hi,

[#25511] [Bug #2079] win32ole's OLEGEN does not create all classes needed when a TLB has more than one class defined — Bruno Antunes <redmine@...>

Bug #2079: win32ole's OLEGEN does not create all classes needed when a TLB has more than one class defined

18 messages 2009/09/10

[#25644] [Bug #2121] mathn/rational destroys Fixnum#/, Fixnum#quo and Bignum#/, Bignum#quo — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Bug #2121: mathn/rational destroys Fixnum#/, Fixnum#quo and Bignum#/, Bignum#quo

12 messages 2009/09/19

[#25709] [Bug #2131] f(not x) => syntax error — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #2131: f(not x) => syntax error

16 messages 2009/09/22

[#25769] A challenge: Enumerator#next in JRuby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>

I have a challenge for anyone who wants to discuss, propose

25 messages 2009/09/25
[#25782] Re: A challenge: Enumerator#next in JRuby — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/09/26

In article <f04d2210909251312q46bd51c0teacc4b0a8c417f0c@mail.gmail.com>,

[#25820] [Feature #2152] Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #2152: Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s

32 messages 2009/09/28

[#25853] [Bug #2160] JSON can't parse input where top-level object is a string — caleb clausen <redmine@...>

Bug #2160: JSON can't parse input where top-level object is a string

11 messages 2009/09/29

[ruby-core:25829] string objects don't survive round-trip in yaml&json

From: Caleb Clausen <caleb@...>
Date: 2009-09-29 00:40:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #25829
It appears that strings containing just newlines don't emerge the same
after a round-trip thru yaml. This appears to be the case in all
versions of ruby's yaml library. I think it's been around forever; I
vaguely remember running across this when I first started fooling with
yaml. Confirmed for sure in 1.9.2dev, 1.9.1, and 1.8.6. I expect the
output of all 3 of the following commands to be "\n", not an empty string:

$ ruby-snapshot -v -ryaml -e 'p YAML.load YAML.dump "\n"'
ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-09-28 trunk 25126) [i686-linux]
""

$ ruby191 -v -ryaml -e 'p YAML.load YAML.dump "\n"'
ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]
""

$ ruby186 -v -ryaml -e 'p YAML.load YAML.dump "\n"'
ruby 1.8.6 (2009-06-08 patchlevel 369) [i686-linux]
-e:1: warning: parenthesize argument(s) for future version
-e:1: warning: parenthesize argument(s) for future version
""



Json has trouble with string round-trips too; it crashes when parsing
any string if at the root of the object tree to be dumped+restored.
Observed in both 1.9.2dev and 1.9.1 (and 1.8.6 with json gem installed).

$ ruby191 -v -rjson -e 'p JSON.parse JSON.unparse "foobar"'
ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]
json/common.rb:274: warning: method redefined; discarding old recurse_proc
json/common.rb:122:in `parse': 574: unexpected token at '"foobar"'
(JSON::ParserError)
	from json/common.rb:122:in `parse'
	from -e:1:in `<main>'

$ ruby -v -rjson -e 'p JSON.parse JSON.unparse "foobar"'
ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-09-28 trunk 25126) [i686-linux]
json/common.rb:273: warning: method redefined; discarding old recurse_proc
json/common.rb:122:in `parse': 618: unexpected token at '"foobar"'
(JSON::ParserError)
	from json/common.rb:122:in `parse'
	from -e:1:in `<main>'


Note that simply enclosing the string in an array makes the problem
disappear:

$ ruby191 -v -rjson -e 'p JSON.parse JSON.unparse ["foobar"]'
ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]
json/common.rb:274: warning: method redefined; discarding old recurse_proc
["foobar"]

(Some overlong lines in console output have been shortened in hopes of
preventing ugly wrapping.)

I'm pretty sure these are both bugs, but I may be missing something.
Before I go ahead and report them, does anyone know a reason why they
shouldn't be considered bugs?

In This Thread

Prev Next