[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build

19 messages 2010/05/01

[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless

9 messages 2010/05/01

[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by

13 messages 2010/05/04

[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly

9 messages 2010/05/05

[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>

Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88

10 messages 2010/05/13

[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs

12 messages 2010/05/22

[ruby-core:30135] Re: [Feature #2152] Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s

From: Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
Date: 2010-05-10 17:17:52 UTC
List: ruby-core #30135
On 10 May 2010 18:59, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
> I recently discovered Float#round the other day, if that's of any use.
>
>> 1.1-0.9
> => 0.20000000000000007
>>> (1.1-0.9).round(2)
> => 0.2
>
Sure, I did know about it, just forgot in this conversion.
So that makes pointless the idea of the supplementary argument to #to_s

So the real deal is still there (and for *many* messages):

Should we accept #to_s returns a pretty-human-like representation of Float,
or do we want to keep current-more-realistic representation for both
#inspect and #to_s?

(But then having in code such horrible "%.2f" % f or "f: #{f.round(2)}")

I already gave my opinion and arguments
(compatibility, consistency with core/stdlib, usefulness,
user-friendly, handy, not useless double method, ...)

Please, those who are not according, be explicit ;)

Best Regards,
B.D.

In This Thread

Prev Next