[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build

19 messages 2010/05/01

[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless

9 messages 2010/05/01

[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by

13 messages 2010/05/04

[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly

9 messages 2010/05/05

[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>

Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88

10 messages 2010/05/13

[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs

12 messages 2010/05/22

[ruby-core:30316] Re: New Coder Etiquette & no extension require

From: Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Date: 2010-05-19 15:27:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #30316
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:11:54PM +0900, Michael Malone wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have been coding in Ruby for a couple of years professionally now, and I
> decided I would like to contribute.  I want to add the ability to require a
> file that has no extension whatsoever (as a gentle introduction) and I would
> start the conversation as to whether it was a good feature or not alongside
> the patch implementing it.  When I went to do said change, I thought the
> file in question could use a bunch of refactoring, but felt that might be a
> little arrogant for my first submission.  So my question is, am I going to
> offend people if I start jumping in and changing code structure like there's
> no tomorrow?  Or should I learn to like the existing style?  Or am I going
> to annoy people more by writing this sort of question to the core mailing
> list?

Make the smallest possible patch to add the feature you want.  Submit a
separate patch for code refactoring.  From my experience, it is more
difficult to get a patch applied when multiple things are going on in
the patch.

HTH.

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

In This Thread

Prev Next