[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build

19 messages 2010/05/01

[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless

9 messages 2010/05/01

[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by

13 messages 2010/05/04

[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly

9 messages 2010/05/05

[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>

Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88

10 messages 2010/05/13

[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs

12 messages 2010/05/22

[ruby-core:30396] [Backport #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88

From: Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-05-24 16:15:46 UTC
List: ruby-core #30396
Issue #3288 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.


Hi,

> I finally made to run the app on Ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-05-21 revision 27947). The app starts fine. No errors. The same on Ruby 1.9.1p378 (2010-01-10 revision 26273). Ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-07-18 trunk 24186) has the bug I reported before ([BUG] rb_add_method: unsupported method type).
>
> I cant reproduce the segmentation fault bug on Ruby 1.9.1 I reported in the first place.

Thank you for confirming, but it's weird...


> @Cezary Baginski
> I have done the reinstallation of Ruby 1.9.2 before. I used rvm install 1.9.2-head as you suggested. But I think I have fallen to a bug in rvm I have found today:
>
*snip*
>
> ruby -v gives patch level 27947 but the app start running on 24186. Strange. I will ask about it on the rvm mailing list.

I wonder you have used wrong version of Ruby due to rvm...?
I may have to add to FAQ, "is it reproduced without rvm?"

Anyway, there seems to be no bug (or already fixed).
May I close this ticket?
If you will get new information indicating that this is not
rvm's bug but core's, feel free to reopen this.

-- 
Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3288

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread