[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>
Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build
[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless
Hi,
On 2 May 2010 01:56, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 2 May 2010 15:24:52 UTC+2, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#29953] [Bug #3241] gem update --system Segmentation fault — Benedikt Eickhoff <redmine@...>
Bug #3241: gem update --system Segmentation fault
Hi,
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 08:55:14PM +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#29993] [Feature:trunk] thread-local yamler — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[#30002] 1.9.1 lib dirs? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hi all.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly
Issue #3248 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#30023] [Bug #3250] [BUG] Segmentation fault — Diogo Almeida <redmine@...>
Bug #3250: [BUG] Segmentation fault
[#30070] [Bug #3255] Trunk fail to build without explicit ./configure options (yaml.h not found) — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
Bug #3255: Trunk fail to build without explicit ./configure options (yaml.h not found)
Hi,
[#30094] suggestion: switch default name for BINARY encoding — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Situation:
(2010/05/08 7:50), Roger Pack wrote:
[#30145] [Bug #3273] Float string conversion — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #3273: Float string conversion
[#30154] [Bug #3275] incompatibility of testrb — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>
Bug #3275: incompatibility of testrb
[#30175] [Problem] DATA and __END__ in a loaded rb file — Charles Cui <zheng.cuizh@...>
how to get global constant DATA in file <a.rb>,if a.rb is loaded by b.rb.
[#30182] [Bug #3281] fail to build fiddle on Debian/lenny by default — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>
Bug #3281: fail to build fiddle on Debian/lenny by default
2010/5/12 Yusuke Endoh <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:26:44PM +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:
2010/5/14 Aaron Patterson <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com>:
[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>
Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88
Issue #3288 has been updated by Szymon Je甜.
[#30249] [Bug #3299] revision.h rule in common.mk is broken for MSVC — Romulo Ceccon <redmine@...>
Bug #3299: revision.h rule in common.mk is broken for MSVC
[#30290] [Bug #3309] net/http calls leak memory and file handles in windows — Pete Higgins <redmine@...>
Bug #3309: net/http calls leak memory and file handles in windows
[#30315] [Bug #3320] emacs ruby-mode.el font-lock fails on symboled string ending with ? — Zev Blut <redmine@...>
Bug #3320: emacs ruby-mode.el font-lock fails on symboled string ending with ?
[#30323] [Feature #3322] Simple Patch to make ruby copy-on-write-friendly — Daniel DeLorme <redmine@...>
Feature #3322: Simple Patch to make ruby copy-on-write-friendly
[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs
From: Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com>
> Does it occur with RubyTk-Kit version (it based on latest tcltklib.c)?
[#30401] [Bug #3336] Memory leak in IO.select() on Windows — HD Moore <redmine@...>
Bug #3336: Memory leak in IO.select() on Windows
[#30406] [Bug #3337] MS-DOS device names are identified as readable_real — HD Moore <redmine@...>
Bug #3337: MS-DOS device names are identified as readable_real
[#30434] [Feature #3346] __DIR__ revisted — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>
Feature #3346: __DIR__ revisted
[#30449] [Bug #3350] Protected methods & documentation — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #3350: Protected methods & documentation
[#30451] [Bug #3352] Delegates: protected methods — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #3352: Delegates: protected methods
[#30513] [Bug #3365] floats revisited (see bug 1841) — Roberto Tomás Collins McCarthy <redmine@...>
Bug #3365: floats revisited (see bug 1841)
[ruby-core:30029] Re: years in Time.utc
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by
> Time.utc? That is, when does Time.utc(y) gives you a time object in
> year y?
I believe that this is both platform and ruby version dependent.
At least for Ruby 1.8.x the internal representation in time is a
signed integer (not a Ruby Integer or Fixnum but a 'hardware' integer)
representing the number of seconds since (or before for a negative
value) the posix epoch Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1970
On 32 bit platforms, this allows times between Fri Dec 13 20:45:52 UTC
1901 and Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 UTC 2038 to be represented as Time
objects.
On 64 bit platforms, the range is much wider, I'm not sure exactly
what it is since you can't seem to add or subtract (2**63 -1) to a
Time representing the epoch in Ruby 1.8.6 or 1.8.7 without running
into an internal gmtime when you inspect the resulting value. But it
can at least represent times between:
Sun Jul 19 17:33:52 UTC -1141705158 and Sun Jun 13 06:26:08 UTC 1141709097
Which might not stretch back to the current cosmological theories
about the time of the Big Bang, but should be wide enough represent
most times 'iinteresting' to Humans.
Time.utc(y) seems to interpret a y between 0 and 38 as being
2000..2038). So it will return a Time object whose year is the passed
parameter + 2000.
So for Ruby 1.8.x compiled with 32 bit integers
Time.utc(y).year == y if y is between 1902 and 2038
And when compiled with 64 bit integers it's true if y is between
some negative value no larger than -1141705157 and -1
or between
39 and some positive value at least 1141709097
Ruby 1.9.2 has changed the internal representation, it looks like it
uses a Ruby integer object internally, so the range expands to
bignums. So I think the answer for 1.9.2 is that you can use any
integer value for year.
--
Rick DeNatale
Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale