[#29911] [Bug #3231] Digest Does Not Build — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #3231: Digest Does Not Build

19 messages 2010/05/01

[#29920] [Feature #3232] Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #3232: Loops (while/until) should return last statement value if any, like if/unless

9 messages 2010/05/01

[#29997] years in Time.utc — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Does anyone have a precise statement about the years supported by

13 messages 2010/05/04

[#30010] [Bug #3248] extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #3248: extension 'tk' is finding tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh incorrectly

9 messages 2010/05/05

[#30226] [Bug #3288] Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88 — Szymon Jeż <redmine@...>

Bug #3288: Segmentation fault - activesupport-3.0.0.beta3/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:88

10 messages 2010/05/13

[#30358] tk doesn't startup well in doze — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Currently with 1.9.x and tk 8.5,the following occurs

12 messages 2010/05/22

[ruby-core:30261] Re: [Bug #3275] incompatibility of testrb

From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2010-05-15 23:43:31 UTC
List: ruby-core #30261
On May 14, 2010, at 22:14 , Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> At Sat, 15 May 2010 09:28:42 +0900,
> Ryan Davis wrote in [ruby-core:30251]:
>> My contribution of minitest_tu_shim was rejected in favor of
>> a homegrown solution written by someone else on ruby-core.
> 
> Not true.  Because it was not useful, so we had to rewrite it.
> What we need is to fix compatibility, not to introduce yet
> another incompatibility.

What part of what I said is not true? Regardless, testrb is NOT my software and I do NOT maintain it. So I don't really understand the point you're trying to make.

Besides, isn't 1.9 _exactly_ the time to introduce incompatibilities? I've seen plenty so far.

In This Thread