[#25936] [Bug:1.9] [rubygems] $LOAD_PATH includes bin directory — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2009/10/05

[#25943] Disabling tainting — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Would it make sense to have a flag passed to the interpreter on startup that

16 messages 2009/10/05

[#26028] [Bug #2189] Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Bug #2189: Math.atanh(1) & Math.atanh(-1) should not raise an error

14 messages 2009/10/10

[#26222] [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds — Mike Pomraning <redmine@...>

Bug #2250: IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds

11 messages 2009/10/22

[#26244] [Bug #2258] Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #2258: Kernel#require inside rb_require() inside rb_protect() inside SysV context fails

24 messages 2009/10/22

[#26361] [Feature #2294] [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Feature #2294: [PATCH] ruby_bind_stack() to embed Ruby in coroutine

42 messages 2009/10/27

[#26371] [Bug #2295] segmentation faults — tomer doron <redmine@...>

Bug #2295: segmentation faults

16 messages 2009/10/27

[ruby-core:25891] Re: Fate of Win32API.rb?

From: "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Date: 2009-10-02 00:14:18 UTC
List: ruby-core #25891
Hello,

In message "[ruby-core:25883] Re: Fate of Win32API.rb?"
    on Oct.01,2009 22:24:04, <jon.forums@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it valid to assume that registry.rb, sspi.rb, resolv.rb from ext/dl/win32/lib/win32 will remain in 2.0 as they (except for sspi.rb which currently requires Win32API) all "require dl/import" rather than Win32API?

I don't know why you stick to not "dl" but "dl/import".
Anyway, those libraries which require "Win32API" are listed on
my To-Do list.


Regards,
-- 
U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp>


In This Thread