[#25257] [Bug #2030] Math.gamma(x) seg faults for integer x larger than 2<<63-1 — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>
Bug #2030: Math.gamma(x) seg faults for integer x larger than 2<<63-1
[#25272] [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
Feature #2032: Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original".
Issue #2032 has been updated by Eric Hodel.
Issue #2032 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
Issue #2032 has been updated by Kazuhiko Shiozaki.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Kazuhiko Shiozaki<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
If readline's change in license is the primary reason for reevaluating
Issue #2032 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
Hi,
> To avoid enbugging a new bug, we must choose the another solutions.
2010/6/6 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
(2010/06/06 20:27), Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:12, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
Hi,
On Jun 14, 2010, at 22:48, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#25275] Ruby platform interface — vondruch@...
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:17 AM, <vondruch@amberg.cz> wrote:
Excerpts from message of Wed Sep 02 13:03:22 +0300 2009:
[#25285] [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Feature #2033: Move Core Development to Git
Issue #2033 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
> Some commiter of Ruby live on Windows.
Jon wrote:
2009/9/4 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
2009/9/4 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
The point I suspect that a lot of those pushing for the move to git
On Sep 4, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Eleanor McHugh wrote:
Issue #2033 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:19, Run Paint Run Run wrote:
>> * Opens Ruby development to a wider range of contributors. Ruby- and
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 19:50, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
Short summary:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Ron
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 16:43, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote=
Run Paint Run Run wrote:
Ruby is a basic infrastructure that needs to be stable. If it goes as agile as
[#25306] [Feature #2034] Consider the ICU Library for Improving and Expanding Unicode Support — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Feature #2034: Consider the ICU Library for Improving and Expanding Unicode Support
[#25360] [Bug #2043] incompatible character encodings — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>
Bug #2043: incompatible character encodings
[#25367] [Bug #2048] Thread#raise: Handling of Current Exception — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #2048: Thread#raise: Handling of Current Exception
[#25394] Unmaintained code (Was: Move Core Development to Git) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
On Sep 4, 2009, at 02:16, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Eric Hodel<drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
I'll volunteer to maintain delegate.rb.
I'll volunteer to maintain English.rb and tempfile.rb.
I would gladly maintain find, observer & ostruct if that can be of any
I think that one responsibility of maintainers of a component should be
[#25420] [Bug #2054] Onigurma Isn't Documented — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #2054: Onigurma Isn't Documented
[#25442] turning off indentation warnings — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Is there a way in 1.9 to turn off only indentation warnings? I like
Hi,
Hi,
On Sep 22, 2009, at 8:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Aaron Patterson wrote:
>>>> I've looked into adding a global variable. I think it looks better,
[#25506] [Bug #2072] Segmentation faults with libxml-ruby and ruby 1.9.1 — 賢司 高橋 <redmine@...>
Bug #2072: Segmentation faults with libxml-ruby and ruby 1.9.1
On Sep 9, 2009, at 11:05 PM, =E8=B3=A2=E5=8F=B8 =E9=AB=98=E6=A9=8B =
[#25540] [Bug #2095] Oniguruma No Longer Understands Unihan Characters — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #2095: Oniguruma No Longer Understands Unihan Characters
[#25571] Implicit block argument in Procs — Cody Brocious <cody.brocious@...>
I ran into some block behavior I thought was a bit odd. Calling a
[#25587] Minimalist Ruby Install for Windows — Mike Hatfield <oakraven13@...>
Hi everyone,
[#25630] [Bug #2114] Array Hash inconsistency — Wim Yedema <redmine@...>
Bug #2114: Array Hash inconsistency
[#25632] [Bug #2117] Binding to a class, a method from the class's superclass's metaclass, fails — "Shane O'Brien" <redmine@...>
Bug #2117: Binding to a class, a method from the class's superclass's metaclass, fails
[#25634] Kernel.eval("local_variables",binding) bug in Ruby 1.9 — Howard Yeh <hayeah@...>
Hi,
[#25635] [Bug #2119] 'gem' method has problem when gems are in ~/.gem and no version requirement is given — Cezary Baginski <redmine@...>
Bug #2119: 'gem' method has problem when gems are in ~/.gem and no version requirement is given
Issue #2119 has been updated by Cezary Baginski.
[#25644] [Bug #2121] mathn/rational destroys Fixnum#/, Fixnum#quo and Bignum#/, Bignum#quo — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Bug #2121: mathn/rational destroys Fixnum#/, Fixnum#quo and Bignum#/, Bignum#quo
Charles Nutter wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Joel VanderWerf
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:29 AM, brian ford <brixen@gmail.com> wrote:
[#25679] Ruby 1.9 pack('m') and unpack('m') not round tripping — Mikel Lindsaar <raasdnil@...>
Hello all,
[#25681] [Bug #2127] Fiber#resume - segfault inside C extension — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>
Bug #2127: Fiber#resume - segfault inside C extension
[#25709] [Bug #2131] f(not x) => syntax error — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>
Bug #2131: f(not x) => syntax error
Issue #2131 has been updated by James M. Lawrence.
[#25756] syck maintenance? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Has anyone taken this over?
Ryan Davis wrote:
There are about 15 open issues relating to yaml/syck.
[#25764] [Proposal] Maintainer confirmation and discharging process — Yugui <yugui@...>
2009/9/25 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
Hi,
[#25769] A challenge: Enumerator#next in JRuby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I have a challenge for anyone who wants to discuss, propose
For what it's worth, although solution 3 is not very pretty, it could
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
In article <f04d2210909251312q46bd51c0teacc4b0a8c417f0c@mail.gmail.com>,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
In article <f04d2210909252208k4fd66540u54a5d280613bb043@mail.gmail.com>,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#25796] [Bug #2144] Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2144: Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s
[#25820] [Feature #2152] Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Feature #2152: Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s
Issue #2152 has been updated by Roger Pack.
Hi,
Hi,
Issue #2152 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
> Issue #2152 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
Hi,
Hi,
[#25831] event hook in 1.9? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
> /**
Ryan Davis wrote:
[#25841] [ANN] Ruby Developer's Meeting 20091013 — Yugui <yugui@...>
Hi,
[#25853] [Bug #2160] JSON can't parse input where top-level object is a string — caleb clausen <redmine@...>
Bug #2160: JSON can't parse input where top-level object is a string
Issue #2160 has been updated by Tim Bray.
Tim Bray wrote:
[#25865] struggling to convince myself 1.9's constant lookup rules make any sense — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
[#25876] Fate of Win32API.rb? — Jon <jon.forums@...>
Spelunking the ruby-core Nabble archives and Redmine hasn't yet shed any
Hello,
[ruby-core:25786] Re: A challenge: Enumerator#next in JRuby
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
> I thought this slowness sometimes ago.
>
> STDIN.lines.next
> is basically same as
> STDIN.gets or raise StopIteration
> but it has overhead of Fiber.
>
> IO has already a method for external iteration method (gets)
> but IO#lines cannot use it.
>
> I think Enumerator.new (and possibly to_enum, enum_for)
> should be able to take an array consists of two method names
> for internal and external iteration as:
> =C2=A0Enumerator.new(obj, [method1, method2], *args)
> method1 is for internal iteration and method2 is for
> external iteration. =C2=A0The enumerator created by
> Enumerator.new uses method2 when next method is called if
> method2 is provided. =C2=A0obj.method2 should return an object
> for external iteration.
Yes, this is along the lines of what Evan Phoenix and I
discussed...providing a way to opt out of Fiber/Generator-based
external iteration.
I like your ideas...more below.
> If Enumerator.new provides such way to avoid Fiber, IO can
> use it as:
>
> class IO
> =C2=A0def lines
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Enumerator.new self, [:each_line, :external_iterator_for_lin=
es]
> =C2=A0end
>
> =C2=A0def to_enum(meth=3D:each, *args)
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0if meth =3D=3D :each || meth =3D=3D :each_line
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0super [:each_line, :external_iterator_for_lines], *ar=
gs
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0else
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0super
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0end
> =C2=A0end
So if doing internal iteration, the first method (each_line) will be
called with a block. If doing external iteration, the second method
(external_iterator_for_lines) will be called to produce an Enumerator
that knows how to do a lightweight external iteration of lines.
> def external_iterator_for_lines
> o =3D Object.new
> o.instance_variable_set(:@io, self)
> def o.next
> @io.gets or raise StopIteration
> end
> o
> end
> end
I guess there would be an analog you could use in custom #each
implementations...
def each
if block_given?
normal each logic
else
Enumerator.new(self, [:each, :each_external])
end
end
Yes, this is definitely a step in the right direction. But I wonder if
allowing people to do arbitrarily complex external iteration is worth
it? It's going to be slow as long as switching stacks is slow, and
it's always going to be a heavy operation on platforms where
stack-juggling isn't permitted (or is too hard to bother trying).
External enumeration is a feature Ruby should have;
arbitrarily-complex continuation-driven external iteration is more of
a problem than a solution.
>
> This idea may solve some part of JRuby problem if a class
> provides custom to_enum. =C2=A0If a class don't provide that or
> user specify unexpected method name for to_enum, it still
> problem though.
I think it's a problem for any implementation since the performance
characteristics of a continuation-based #next are atrocious. And yet
there it is, luring you to use it, even though it's slow on 1.8.7 and
1.9 and spins up a whole native thread on JRuby (and eventually on
IronRuby and maybe others).
And so it's still clear...I think external enumeration is a great
feature, but I think there should be a clearly-defined protocol for
opting *in* to Enumerator#next, not a protocol to have to follow to
opt *out* of poor performance or heavyweight enumerators as in JRuby.
Put simply, I think collections should be required to *choose* to use
a fiber to implement external iteration, rather than using fibers
automatically.
So I'm thinking that if you implement "each" but not your own
"enum_for" or "to_enum", #next shouldn't work. You can then choose to
implement it with a fiber or not.
(but at the very least we need a clearly-defined protocol for opting
out, since I suspect *most* users of external iteration will *have to*
opt out to get reasonable performance)
- Charlie