From: Jon <jon.forums@...>
Date: 2009-09-25T21:57:13+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:25766] Re: syck maintenance?

--0016e6db2996660d710474667c26
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

> There are pure ruby variants (rubinius has/had one, I think jruby did too).
> FFI has probably supplanted the pure ruby versions by now....


[..snip..]


> For long term pure ruby is probably a better way to go, but I haven't seen
> one I liked yet.
>
> My opinion could be a bit out of date. It has been a little while since
> I've looked at this problem.
>
>
If a reliable and supported FFI version existed, would you still believe a
pure ruby version would be the correct long-term solution?

Jon

--0016e6db2996660d710474667c26
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=A0<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
There are pure ruby variants (rubinius has/had one, I think jruby did too).=
 FFI has probably supplanted the pure ruby versions by now....</blockquote>=
<div><br></div><div>[..snip..]=A0</div><div>=A0=A0</div><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex;">
For long term pure ruby is probably a better way to go, but I haven&#39;t s=
een one I liked yet.<br>
<br>
My opinion could be a bit out of date. It has been a little while since I&#=
39;ve looked at this problem.<br>

<br>
</blockquote></div><br><div>If a reliable and supported FFI version existed=
, would you still believe a pure ruby version would be the correct long-ter=
m solution?</div><div><br></div><div>Jon</div>

--0016e6db2996660d710474667c26--