[#25272] [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2032: Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original".

51 messages 2009/09/02
[#25368] [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Kazuhiko Shiozaki <redmine@...> 2009/09/04

Issue #2032 has been updated by Kazuhiko Shiozaki.

[#25461] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/09/07

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Kazuhiko Shiozaki<redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#25463] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/09/08

Hi,

[#30610] [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/06/06

Issue #2032 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#30611] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/06/06

Hi,

[#30614] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/06/06

> To avoid enbugging a new bug, we must choose the another solutions.

[#30616] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/06/06

2010/6/6 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:

[#30652] Re: [Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/06/08

(2010/06/06 20:27), Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

[#25285] [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Feature #2033: Move Core Development to Git

75 messages 2009/09/02
[#25290] [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/09/02

Issue #2033 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#25297] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2009/09/02

> Some commiter of Ruby live on Windows.

[#25342] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/09/03

Jon wrote:

[#25343] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/09/03

2009/9/4 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:

[#25345] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/09/03

Michal Suchanek wrote:

[#25299] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2009/09/02

On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:19, Run Paint Run Run wrote:

[#25306] [Feature #2034] Consider the ICU Library for Improving and Expanding Unicode Support — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Feature #2034: Consider the ICU Library for Improving and Expanding Unicode Support

16 messages 2009/09/03

[#25394] Unmaintained code (Was: Move Core Development to Git) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

On Sep 4, 2009, at 02:16, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

10 messages 2009/09/05

[#25420] [Bug #2054] Onigurma Isn't Documented — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #2054: Onigurma Isn't Documented

17 messages 2009/09/05

[#25442] turning off indentation warnings — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

Is there a way in 1.9 to turn off only indentation warnings? I like

19 messages 2009/09/06
[#25510] Re: turning off indentation warnings — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/09/10

Hi,

[#25511] [Bug #2079] win32ole's OLEGEN does not create all classes needed when a TLB has more than one class defined — Bruno Antunes <redmine@...>

Bug #2079: win32ole's OLEGEN does not create all classes needed when a TLB has more than one class defined

18 messages 2009/09/10

[#25644] [Bug #2121] mathn/rational destroys Fixnum#/, Fixnum#quo and Bignum#/, Bignum#quo — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Bug #2121: mathn/rational destroys Fixnum#/, Fixnum#quo and Bignum#/, Bignum#quo

12 messages 2009/09/19

[#25709] [Bug #2131] f(not x) => syntax error — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #2131: f(not x) => syntax error

16 messages 2009/09/22

[#25769] A challenge: Enumerator#next in JRuby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>

I have a challenge for anyone who wants to discuss, propose

25 messages 2009/09/25
[#25782] Re: A challenge: Enumerator#next in JRuby — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/09/26

In article <f04d2210909251312q46bd51c0teacc4b0a8c417f0c@mail.gmail.com>,

[#25820] [Feature #2152] Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #2152: Split functionality of Float#inspect and Float#to_s

32 messages 2009/09/28

[#25853] [Bug #2160] JSON can't parse input where top-level object is a string — caleb clausen <redmine@...>

Bug #2160: JSON can't parse input where top-level object is a string

11 messages 2009/09/29

[ruby-core:25434] Re: [Feature #2033] Move Core Development to Git

From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2009-09-06 02:13:08 UTC
List: ruby-core #25434
On Sep 5, 2009, at 17:59 , Run Paint Run Run wrote:

> RubyGems, Rake, and MiniTest show the utility of this approach.

I'm really not comfortable with you using one of my projects as =20
justification for your idea. Especially since I'm completely against =20
your idea.

I should also point out that rubygems is on subversion and minitest is =20=

on *gasp* perforce, so they should be considered counterexamples.

Rake is, I believe, officially on git... and yet, it seems to have had =20=

far fewer releases (barring compatibility fix releases) and accepts =20
far fewer contributions than minitest or rubygems.

> There's passion here. Feed it.

We're WAY beyond passion. I don't think it should be fed.

There is nothing stopping you or anyone else from using git to work on =20=

ruby. Indeed, it has been pointed out several times in this thread, =20
yet that seems to be ignored continuously. There is no reason for you =20=

or anyone else to be pushing git on others.

This zealotry is tiring.

zealot |=CB=88zel=C9=99t|
noun
a person who is fanatical and uncompromising in pursuit of their =20
religious, political, or other ideals.
=E2=80=A2 ( Zealot) historical a member of an ancient Jewish sect aiming =
at a =20
world Jewish theocracy and resisting the Romans until ad 70.
DERIVATIVES
zealotry |-=C9=99tr=C4=93| noun
ORIGIN mid 16th cent. (in the sense [member of an ancient Jewish =20
sect] ): viaecclesiastical Latin from Greek z=C4=93l=C5=8Dt=C4=93s, from =
z=C4=93loun =20
=E2=80=98be jealous,=E2=80=99 from z=C4=93los (seezeal ).

THE RIGHT WORD
An enthusiast displays an intense and eager interest in something (: a =20=

sky-diving enthusiast).
A fanatic is not only intense and eager but possibly irrational in his =20=

or her enthusiasm; fanatic suggests extreme devotion and a willingness =20=

to go to any length to maintain or carry out one's beliefs (: a fly-=20
fishing fanatic who hired a helicopter to reach his favorite stream).
A zealot exhibits not only extreme devotion but vehement activity in =20
support of a cause or goal (: a feminist zealot who spent most of her =20=

time campaigning for women's rights).
An extremist is a supporter of extreme doctrines or practices, =20
particularly in a political context (: a paramilitary extremist who =20
anticipated the overthrow of the government).
But it is the bigot who causes the most trouble, exhibiting obstinate =20=

and often blind devotion to his or her beliefs and opinions. In =20
contrast to fanatic and zealot, the term bigot implies intolerance and =20=

contempt for those who do not agree (: a bigot who could not accept =20
his daughter's decision to marry outside her religion).=

In This Thread