From: Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>
Date: 2009-09-24T01:17:38+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:25734] Re: [Bug #2131] f(not x) => syntax error

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:25713] [Bug #2131] f(not x) => syntax error"
> � �on Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:13:06 +0900, "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> writes:
>
> |This should have been classified as a feature request.
> |
> |Since (not x) is legal syntax, it is my opinion that f(not x) should be legal.
>
> So, do you mean a,b,c = 1,2,3 is legal syntax, should we allow
> f(a,b,c = 1,2,3) ?

or even

  f(class Foo;attr_accessor :bar;end;Foo.new.x=5)

<G>

-- 
Rick DeNatale

Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale