ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#15701] Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2008/03/01
[#15702] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/03/01

On Feb 29, 2008, at 23:45 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15703] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/01

Hi,
[#15706] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Tadashi Saito <shiba@...2.accsnet.ne.jp> 2008/03/01

Hello,
[#15708] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/03/01

Hi --
[#15710] Ruby 1.9.0-1 repacked (Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/01

Hi,
[#15806] Re: [ruby-dev:33947] Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/05

まつもと ゆきひろです
[#15735] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2008/03/03

On [Sat, 01.03.2008 16:45], Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15736] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/03

Hi,
[#15737] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2008/03/03

On [Mon, 03.03.2008 17:50], Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15739] Re: Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/03

Hi,

[#15704] Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — Lin Jen-Shin <godfat@...>

Proc#curry doesn't work on function which produces function,

8 messages 2008/03/01
[#15721] Re: Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/03/02

Hi,
[#15722] Re: Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/02

>>>>> "Y" == Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> writes:
[#15723] Re: Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/03/02

2008/3/2, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr>:
[#15724] Re: Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/02

>>>>> "Y" == Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> writes:
[#15725] Re: Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/03/02

2008/3/2, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr>:
[#15744] Re: Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2008/03/03

On Sunday 02 March 2008, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#15716] Re: Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/01

>>>>> "L" == Lin Jen-Shin <godfat@gmail.com> writes:

[#15707] Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi, developers,

21 messages 2008/03/01
[#15750] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/03/03

I'm a little confused with what you are asking, so let me try to summarize.
[#15753] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/03/03

> -----Original Message-----
[#15755] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/03/03

On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com>
[#15745] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/03

On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:58:00PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#15752] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/03/03

> -----Original Message-----
[#15765] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/04

On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:22:56AM +0900, Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#15749] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/03/03

Hi,
[#15764] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/04

On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 06:41:59AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#15971] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/03/21

Hi,
[#15972] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/03/21

It might be helpful if you went over the tracker list and make note of which
[#16003] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/03/24

At Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:43:50 +0900,
[#16004] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/03/24

At Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:16:54 +0900,
[#16006] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/24

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#16117] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/04/03

At Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:39:45 +0900,
[#16312] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/04/09

Hi,
[#16331] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/04/10

Are all the methods (Object.tap, Proc.curry, Symbol.to_proc and so on)
[#16377] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/04/13

Sorry for replying too late,
[#16383] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/04/14

Hi,
[#16144] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2008/04/03

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#16145] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/04/03

Hi,

[#15709] capitalize and downcase — Trans <transfire@...>

I've always wondered why String#capitalize downcases the whole string

6 messages 2008/03/01
[#15731] Re: capitalize and downcase — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/03

Hi,
[#15792] Re: capitalize and downcase — mathew <meta@...> 2008/03/05

[#15712] Re: capitalize and downcase — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/03/01

On 3/1/08, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#15714] Re: capitalize and downcase — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/03/01

[#15718] Re: capitalize and downcase — "Jim Cropcho" <jim.cropcho@...> 2008/03/01

I agree w/ Trans. Methods should not do more than they say they are doing,

[#15711] bootstrap/test_knownbug.rb — ts <decoux@...>

3 messages 2008/03/01
[#15719] Re: bootstrap/test_knownbug.rb — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/02

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#15720] Re: bootstrap/test_knownbug.rb — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/02

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

[#15713] Ruby String hash key overflow when converting to Fixnum. — "Chiyuan Zhang" <pluskid@...>

Hi, all! I've opened a issue at rubyforge:

4 messages 2008/03/01
[#15715] Re: Ruby String hash key overflow when converting to Fixnum. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/01

Hi,
[#15717] Re: Ruby String hash key overflow when converting to Fixnum. — "Chiyuan Zhang" <pluskid@...> 2008/03/01

2008/3/1, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>:
[#15732] Re: Ruby String hash key overflow when converting to Fixnum. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/03

Hi,

[#15726] openssl, zlib1 on windows — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>

Hello All,

3 messages 2008/03/02
[#15727] Re: openssl, zlib1 on windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/03/02

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Masoom <masoom.shaikh@gmail.com> wrote:
[#15738] Re: openssl, zlib1 on windows — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...> 2008/03/03

Luis thanks, I will attempt this now.

[#15728] Question on build process - skipping unsupported extensions — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2008/03/03
[#15729] Re: Question on build process - skipping unsupported extensions — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/03/03

Hello,
[#15733] Re: Question on build process - skipping unsupported extensions — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2008/03/03

U.Nakamura wrote:
[#15734] Re: Question on build process - skipping unsupported extensions — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/03

Hi,
[#15743] Re: Question on build process - skipping unsupported extensions — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2008/03/03

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#15730] Re: Question on build process - skipping unsupported extensions — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/03

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#15740] Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>

Hi.

31 messages 2008/03/03
[#15741] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com> 2008/03/03

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15742] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/03

Hi,
[#15829] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com> 2008/03/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15882] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/13

Daniel DeLorme wrote:
[#15892] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/14

Hi.
[#15893] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com> 2008/03/14

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15897] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/14

Daniel DeLorme wrote:
[#15898] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/03/14

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote:
[#15900] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2008/03/14

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote:
[#15902] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/14

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#15904] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/03/14

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15963] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/20

Hi.
[#15964] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/20

Hi,
[#15965] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15966] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/20

Hi,
[#15967] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15969] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/03/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15830] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com> 2008/03/08

I believe I managed to close the performance gap to only 6% slower than
[#15831] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com> 2008/03/08

Third email in a row... I hope that's not considered spamming ~_~
[#15832] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/08

Hi,
[#15873] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/12

Daniel DeLorme wrote:
[#15879] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com> 2008/03/13

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15881] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/13

Daniel DeLorme wrote:
[#15874] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/12

Hi,
[#15913] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/15

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15773] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...> 2008/03/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15824] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/07

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15826] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/07

On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 09:04:45PM +0900, Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15827] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/07

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#15828] Re: Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/03/07

Hongli Lai wrote:

[#15746] Am I misinterpreting the new keyword arguments to IO.foreach and friends? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I was expecting this to pass lines to the block:

5 messages 2008/03/03
[#15747] Re: Am I misinterpreting the new keyword arguments to IO.foreach and friends? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/03/03

Hi,
[#15748] Re: Am I misinterpreting the new keyword arguments to IO.foreach and friends? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/03

[#15763] Re: Am I misinterpreting the new keyword arguments to IO.foreach and friends? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/04

[#15766] Re: Am I misinterpreting the new keyword arguments to IO.foreach and friends? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/03/04

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#15751] How should I document Kernel.exit? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

In 1.8, the following code

4 messages 2008/03/03
[#15757] Re: How should I document Kernel.exit? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/03

Hi,
[#15769] Re: How should I document Kernel.exit? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/04

Hi,
[#15777] Re: How should I document Kernel.exit? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/04

[#15754] local_variables and bindings — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Still a-documenting... :)

2 messages 2008/03/03
[#15770] Re: local_variables and bindings — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/04

>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> writes:

[#15756] embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj Kurapati" <sunaku@...>

Hello,

18 messages 2008/03/03
[#15759] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/04

Hi,
[#15760] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/04

Hi,
[#15762] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#15767] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/04

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#15771] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/04

Hi,
[#15794] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/05

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16066] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside rb_thread_create() — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/29
[#16067] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside rb_thread_create() — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/29

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#16069] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside rb_thread_create() — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/29

ts wrote:
[#16070] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside rb_thread_create() — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/29

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#15772] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/04

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#15793] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/05

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15797] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/05

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#15895] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/14

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15896] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/14

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#15901] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread - full example — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/14

Hello,
[#15768] Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Straub, Marc-Oliver" <marc-oliver.straub@...> 2008/03/04

This makes it difficult to embed ruby in component framework applications (e.g. OpenOffice), since you can't be sure which thread instantiates your component.

[#15774] onenine.rb — Trans <transfire@...>

For the next version of Facets I broke out all the methods now

2 messages 2008/03/04
[#15790] Re: onenine.rb — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/03/05

A very minor suggestion: onenine is difficult to read. What about one_nine ?

[#15775] next(n), succ(n) ? — Trans <transfire@...>

Can anyone see any reason against adding an optional parameter to

6 messages 2008/03/04
[#15903] Re: next(n), succ(n) ? — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/03/14

[#15905] Re: next(n), succ(n) ? — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/03/14

Hello,
[#15906] Re: next(n), succ(n) ? — Chris Cummer <chris@...> 2008/03/14

On 14-Mar-08, at 9:25 AM, Trans wrote:
[#15908] Re: next(n), succ(n) ? — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/03/14

[#15776] Re: next(n), succ(n) ? — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/03/04

[#15778] Named captures and regular captures — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

It seems that once you have a named capture in a regular expression,

5 messages 2008/03/04
[#15779] Re: Named captures and regular captures — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/03/04

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#15780] Re: Named captures and regular captures — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/04

[#15781] Re: Named captures and regular captures — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2008/03/04

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#15782] Re: Named captures and regular captures — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/04

[#15783] Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

15 messages 2008/03/04
[#15784] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/03/04

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#15798] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/05

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#15799] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/05

On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:52:40AM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#15800] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/05

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#15812] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/06

On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 03:42:04AM +0900, Phlip wrote:
[#15813] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/06

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#15818] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/03/07

[#15801] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/03/05

> -----Original Message-----
[#15785] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/04

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#15786] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/03/04

Phlip wrote:
[#15787] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/04

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#15788] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...> 2008/03/04

On 05/03/2008, Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#15789] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/03/04

> -----Original Message-----
[#15791] Re: Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/05

>> Would it not be better to have a startup and shutdown method

[#15802] Just wondering about mod_freeze() — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

static VALUE

2 messages 2008/03/05
[#15803] Re: Just wondering about mod_freeze() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/05

Hi,

[#15804] Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/03/05

[#15805] Bugs overview — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/03/05

[#15808] Defect for the signal usage of SIGVTALRM in Ruby 1.9 implementation — "Chirag Mistry" <chirag80bece@...>

Hi All

2 messages 2008/03/06
[#15811] Re: Defect for the signal usage of SIGVTALRM in Ruby 1.9 implementation — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/06

Hi,

[#15809] defect for the signal usage of SIGINT in Ruby 1.9 implementation — "Chirag Mistry" <chirag80bece@...>

Hi All

2 messages 2008/03/06
[#15819] Re: defect for the signal usage of SIGINT in Ruby 1.9 implementation — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/07

Hi,

[#15810] IRHG -- Untranslated Header: <h3>???????</h3> — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Need Translation of "<h3>???????</h3>" for IRHG.

3 messages 2008/03/06
[#15834] Re: IRHG -- Untranslated Header: <h3>???????</h3> — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/03/08

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Charles Thornton
[#15854] Re: IRHG -- Untranslated Header: <h3>???????</h3> — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2008/03/11

Wilson Bilkovich wrote:

[#15814] Improved documentation for mkmf — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>

Hi.

1 message 2008/03/06

[#15815] IRHG -- Another Attempt to Send Japanese Header! — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

3 messages 2008/03/07
[#15816] Re: IRHG -- Another Attempt to Send Japanese Header! — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/07

Hi,
[#15817] Re: IRHG -- Another Attempt to Send Japanese Header! — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2008/03/07

fa i na ra i za -> finalizer

[#15825] irb — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/03/07

[#15833] Module#dup — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/03/08

[#15835] TimeoutError in core, timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...>

I've been reworking JRuby's stdlib to improve performance and fix

10 messages 2008/03/09
[#15847] timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/03/10

On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 12:13 +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#15851] Re: [PATCH] timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/11

Hi,
[#15852] Re: [PATCH] timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/03/11

On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 10:56 +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#15853] Re: [PATCH] timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/03/11

On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 12:56 +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#15858] Re: [PATCH] timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/03/11

On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 12:56 +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#15836] Re: [RFC] TimeoutError in core, timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/03/09

On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 12:13 +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#15843] Re: [RFC] TimeoutError in core, timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/10

Hi,
[#15844] Re: [RFC] TimeoutError in core, timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/03/10

On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 13:38 +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#15868] Re: [RFC] TimeoutError in core, timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/03/12

n Mon, 2008-03-10 at 13:38 +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#15837] Correct procedure for patch review? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>

Hi.

5 messages 2008/03/09
[#15841] Re: Correct procedure for patch review? — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/03/10

Hello Hongli,
[#15845] Re: Correct procedure for patch review? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/10

Martin Duerst wrote:
[#15842] Re: Correct procedure for patch review? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/10

Hi,
[#15846] Re: Correct procedure for patch review? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/10

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#15838] Bug in Fixnum#& with respect to coercion into a bignum — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>

Hello all,

4 messages 2008/03/09
[#15840] Re: Bug in Fixnum#& with respect to coercion into a bignum — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/10

Hi,
[#15859] Re: Bug in Fixnum#& with respect to coercion into a bignum — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/11

Hi,
[#15839] Re: Bug in Fixnum#& with respect to coercion into a bignum — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...> 2008/03/09

[#15848] What's the current state of * and/or to_a? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

3 messages 2008/03/10
[#15849] Re: What's the current state of * and/or to_a? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/03/11

On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 08:40 +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#15850] Re: What's the current state of * and/or to_a? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/03/11

Hi --

[#15855] Ruby 1.8.6 trace return line numbers wrong — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

Consider this program:

4 messages 2008/03/11
[#15864] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 trace return line numbers wrong — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/12

Hi,
[#15869] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 trace return line numbers wrong — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/03/12

I tried the patch out. It works great! And it seems to match what's done on
[#15872] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 trace return line numbers wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/12

Hi,

[#15856] Ruby on GPU — "Jordi Polo" <mumismo@...>

Maybe this mail is more ruby-talk material...

3 messages 2008/03/11
[#15857] Re: Ruby on GPU — "Jason Roelofs" <jameskilton@...> 2008/03/11

I think you're misunderstanding what PyGPU does. PyGPU is simply a
[#15989] Re: Ruby on GPU — "Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso" <grabber@...> 2008/03/23

You can try re-write PyGPU in Ruby. But it does not make sense to me.

[#15860] Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — Jos Backus <jos@...>

DSecRG Advisory #DSECRG-08-026 aka -018 describes a remote directory traversal

7 messages 2008/03/11
[#15861] Re: Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/03/11

Hi,
[#15863] Re: Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/03/11

[#15866] Re: Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2008/03/12

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 07:36:54AM +0900, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#15867] Re: Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2008/03/12

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 07:36:54AM +0900, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#15862] Re: Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/03/11

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> wrote:
[#15865] Re: Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2008/03/12

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 07:55:36AM +0900, Wilson Bilkovich wrote:

[#15871] Sparc architecture optimizations — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>

Someone at Sun has been looking at Ruby on Sparc:

10 messages 2008/03/12
[#15959] Re: Sparc architecture optimizations — Prashant Srinivasan <Prashant.Srinivasan@...> 2008/03/19

Thomas Enebo wrote:
[#16159] SPARC architecture optimizations — Prashant Srinivasan <Prashant.Srinivasan@...> 2008/04/04

Hello Ruby-core,
[#16265] Re: [PATCH] SPARC architecture optimizations — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/04/08

Hi,
[#16285] Re: [PATCH] SPARC architecture optimizations — Prashant Srinivasan <Prashant.Srinivasan@...> 2008/04/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16396] Re: [PATCH] SPARC architecture optimizations — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/04/15

Prashant Srinivasan wrote:
[#16443] Re: [PATCH] SPARC architecture optimizations — Prashant Srinivasan <Prashant.Srinivasan@...> 2008/04/18

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#16445] Re: [PATCH] SPARC architecture optimizations — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/04/19

Prashant Srinivasan wrote:
[#16530] Re: [PATCH] SPARC architecture optimizations — Prashant Srinivasan <Prashant.Srinivasan@...> 2008/04/23

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#16536] Re: [PATCH] SPARC architecture optimizations — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/04/23

Prashant Srinivasan wrote:

[#15877] Ruby1.9 Bug Report #18790 — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Hi list

1 message 2008/03/12

[#15880] Ruby 1.8.6 binding value after "if" expression evaluation — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

Here's another trace hook weirdness that I've encountered.

6 messages 2008/03/13
[#15883] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 binding value after "if" expression evaluation — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/03/13

Hello,
[#15884] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 binding value after "if" expression evaluation — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/03/13

Thanks. The output you report matches what I get in 1.8.6 and suggests where
[#15889] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 binding value after "if" expression evaluation — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/03/14

I think I've found why this is happening. The trace hook for NODE_IF is
[#15890] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 binding value after "if" expression evaluation — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/03/14

A slightly shorter patch by sinking common code:
[#15891] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 binding value after "if" expression evaluation — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/03/14

Actually, probably the sunk code isn't as precise because we probably want

[#15885] IRHG - GC and threads — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

OK Guys,

2 messages 2008/03/13
[#15888] Re: IRHG - GC and threads — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/13

Hi,

[#15886] IRHG - GC and Threads - one more question — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

GC runs a system level - right!

1 message 2008/03/13

[#15887] IRHG - Abort Threads? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Why is rb_gc_abort_threads() run at the completion of marking?

2 messages 2008/03/13
[#15894] Re: IRHG - Abort Threads? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/14

[#15899] IRHG - Proc End Objects — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I have not dived into EVAL.C as of yet

1 message 2008/03/14

[#15907] Range#member? semantics seem wrong — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Range#member? has been changed so that it the start and end of the

6 messages 2008/03/14
[#15935] Re: Range#member? semantics seem wrong — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/03/18

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#15946] Re: Range#member? semantics seem wrong — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/18

[#15951] Re: Range#member? semantics seem wrong — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/03/18

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#15952] Re: Range#member? semantics seem wrong — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/18

[#15944] Re: Range#member? semantics seem wrong — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/18

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:28:40AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#15909] RARRAY_PTR — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2008/03/15
[#15910] Re: RARRAY_PTR — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/15

Hi,
[#15911] Re: RARRAY_PTR — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2008/03/15

Hi,
[#15912] Re: RARRAY_PTR — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/15

Hi,
[#15914] Re: RARRAY_PTR — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2008/03/15

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#15916] Re: RARRAY_PTR — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/03/16

I second this idea. In fact, Laurent and I have discussed this kind of

[#15915] Patch for ruby-mode.el: Use run-mode-hooks instead of run-hooks — "Chiyuan Zhang" <pluskid@...>

Hi, Matz:

3 messages 2008/03/16
[#15921] Re: Patch for ruby-mode.el: Use run-mode-hooks instead of run-hooks — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/17

Hi,
[#15941] Re: Patch for ruby-mode.el: Use run-mode-hooks instead of run-hooks — "Chiyuan Zhang" <pluskid@...> 2008/03/18

Yeah! In fact, I encounter this problem when writing the

[#15917] Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>

Ruby 1.9 (trunk) seems to crash when running the supplied RubyGems and Rake:

7 messages 2008/03/16
[#15919] Re: Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/17

Hi,
[#15922] Re: Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/17

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#15923] Re: Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/17

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 06:53:19PM +0900, Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15925] Re: Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/17

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#15926] Re: Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/17

>>>>> "H" == Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> writes:
[#15929] Re: Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/03/17

ts wrote:

[#15918] make sure version numbers can be determined — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2008/03/16
[#15920] Re: [PATCH] make sure version numbers can be determined — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/17

Hi,

[#15924] IRHG -- Depreciated Methods add_finalizer and remove_finalizer Problems — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

The depreciated methods

1 message 2008/03/17

[#15927] how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

This works in Ruby (1.9):

8 messages 2008/03/17
[#15928] Re: how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/17

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#15930] Re: how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/17

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:29:07AM +0900, ts wrote:
[#15931] Re: how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/17

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#17143] Re: how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/08

Hi,
[#18404] Re: how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/08/27

On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:25:32AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#18430] Re: how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/09/01

Hi,
[#18440] Re: how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/09/02

On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:16:45AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#15932] Bug in Thread.set_trace_func — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

@@ -2904,7 +2904,7 @@

1 message 2008/03/18

[#15933] complex and rational — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Before I start doing the documentation for the PickAxe, could I just

5 messages 2008/03/18
[#15934] Re: complex and rational — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/18

Hi,
[#15943] Re: complex and rational — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/18

[#15945] Re: complex and rational — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/18

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:38:55PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#15949] Re: complex and rational — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/18

[#15936] Are Depreciated Methods "add_final" & "remove_final" supposed to ACTUALLY WORK? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

In Working on IRHG Docs for GC the following

6 messages 2008/03/18
[#15937] Re: Are Depreciated Methods "add_final" & "remove_final" supposed to ACTUALLY WORK? — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/18

>>>>> "C" == Charles Thornton <ceo@hawthorne-press.com> writes:
[#15939] Re: Are Depreciated Methods "add_final" & "remove_final" supposed to ACTUALLY WORK? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2008/03/18

ts wrote:
[#15940] Re: Are Depreciated Methods "add_final" & "remove_final" supposed to ACTUALLY WORK? — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/18

>>>>> "C" == Charles Thornton <ceo@hawthorne-press.com> writes:
[#15942] Re: Are Depreciated Methods "add_final" & "remove_final" supposed to ACTUALLY WORK? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2008/03/18

ts wrote:
[#15947] Re: Are Depreciated Methods "add_final" & "remove_final" supposed to ACTUALLY WORK? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/18

Hi,

[#15938] Questions on Enumerator#skip_first and Enumerable#first — "Artem Voroztsov" <artem.voroztsov@...>

I asked in ruby-talk, but did not get answer.

4 messages 2008/03/18
[#15948] Re: Questions on Enumerator#skip_first and Enumerable#first — James Gray <james@...> 2008/03/18

On Mar 18, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Artem Voroztsov wrote:
[#15950] Re: Questions on Enumerator#skip_first and Enumerable#first — "Artem Voroztsov" <artem.voroztsov@...> 2008/03/18

2008/3/18, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>:
[#15953] Re: Questions on Enumerator#skip_first and Enumerable#first — "Artem Voroztsov" <artem.voroztsov@...> 2008/03/18

I remember Matz talked about LazyArray's in Ruby 2.0

[#15954] REXML in patch 1.8.6 patch 111 and 1.9.0 — "Will Sobel" <will.sobel@...>

The version of REXML in 1.8.6 patch 111 and 1.9.0 are broken.

3 messages 2008/03/18
[#15955] Re: REXML in patch 1.8.6 patch 111 and 1.9.0 — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2008/03/18

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Will Sobel <will.sobel@gmail.com> wrote:
[#15956] Re: REXML in patch 1.8.6 patch 111 and 1.9.0 — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/19

Will Sobel wrote:

[#15957] Two questions on Encoding#dummy — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

First, is this description about right?

3 messages 2008/03/19
[#15958] Re: Two questions on Encoding#dummy — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/19

Hi,
[#15961] Re: Two questions on Encoding#dummy — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/19

[#15960] Dir#inspect — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/03/19

[#15962] update URI to reflect RFC 3986 ? — Jeremy Hinegardner <jeremy@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2008/03/19

[#15968] IRHG - Input needed on alternative GC implementations — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Dear Core,

1 message 2008/03/20

[#15973] fixing test/unit --name — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2008/03/21
[#15974] Re: [PATCH] fixing test/unit --name — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/03/21

[#16062] Re: [PATCH] fixing test/unit --name — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/28

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 04:54:53AM +0900, Ryan Davis wrote:

[#15975] Bugs in REXML — "Federico Builes" <federico.builes@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2008/03/21
[#15976] Re: Bugs in REXML — "Federico Builes" <federico.builes@...> 2008/03/21

On 3/21/08, Federico Builes <federico.builes@gmail.com> wrote:
[#15982] Re: Bugs in REXML — mathew <meta@...> 2008/03/22

On Mar 21, 2008, at 17:35, Federico Builes wrote:
[#15984] Re: Bugs in REXML — "Federico Builes" <federico.builes@...> 2008/03/22

On 3/22/08, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
[#15988] Re: Bugs in REXML — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/03/23

At 05:30 08/03/23, mathew wrote:
[#15994] Re: Bugs in REXML — "Federico Builes" <federico.builes@...> 2008/03/23

On 3/23/08, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
[#15999] Re: Bugs in REXML — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/03/24

Federico Builes wrote:
[#16000] Re: Bugs in REXML — "Federico Builes" <federico.builes@...> 2008/03/24

On 3/23/08, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

[#15980] 1.8.6 memory leak? — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/03/22
[#15995] Re: 1.8.6 memory leak? — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...> 2008/03/23

By the way, I also have a valgrind trace of this leak. Running with
[#15996] Re: 1.8.6 memory leak? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/03/23

Hi Stephen,
[#16008] Re: 1.8.6 memory leak? — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...> 2008/03/24

Thanks Vladimir, that's interesting (particularly about Rubinius).
[#16018] Re: 1.8.6 memory leak? — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...> 2008/03/26

Incidentally, I believe this to also be the same issue as reported

[#15981] Evaluation order of block pass versus arguments — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

I was writing up some specs for evaluation order today and discovered

2 messages 2008/03/22
[#15987] Re: Evaluation order of block pass versus arguments — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/03/23

Sorry, I realized there's no call for action here. Can we get an

[#15983] Changing the algorithm of String#* — apeiros <apeiros@...>

Hi there

6 messages 2008/03/22
[#16001] Re: Changing the algorithm of String#* — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/24

Hi,
[#16002] Re: Changing the algorithm of String#* — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/03/24

At 17:29 08/03/24, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16007] Re: Changing the algorithm of String#* — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2008/03/24

Am 24.03.2008 um 10:17 schrieb Martin Duerst:
[#16005] Re: Changing the algorithm of String#* — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/03/24

In article <E1JdhWd-0004oI-T1@x61.netlab.jp>,
[#16545] Re: Changing the algorithm of String#* — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2008/04/23

Am 24.03.2008 um 09:29 schrieb Yukihiro Matsumoto:

[#15985] 1.9 and 1.8.6: Fixnum#gcd(Fixnum) improves performance of Date, Rational. — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>

Can this be added to 1.8.7 and trunk?

1 message 2008/03/23

[#15986] wrong sitearch definition for MinGW builds — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>

Hello List,

2 messages 2008/03/23
[#15998] Re: wrong sitearch definition for MinGW builds — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/24

Hi,

[#15990] Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

35 messages 2008/03/23
[#15991] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/23

[#15992] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/03/23

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#15993] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/03/23

Hi Dave,
[#15997] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/23

[#16024] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/03/26

Hi Dave,
[#16025] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/26

Hi,
[#16026] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/26

[#16027] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/26

Hi,
[#16029] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/26

[#16030] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/26

Hi,
[#16031] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/26

[#16032] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/03/26

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16033] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/26

[#16034] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/26

Hi,
[#16035] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/26

[#16041] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/03/26

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16042] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/26

[#16043] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/03/26

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16044] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/26

[#16045] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/03/27

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16046] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/27

[#16050] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/03/27

Dave,
[#16052] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com> 2008/03/27

This is all a semantic problem. Different people have different
[#16055] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/03/28

Daniel DeLorme wrote:
[#16060] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/03/28

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#16061] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/28

[#16056] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/03/28

Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
[#16053] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/28

[#16074] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/03/30

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16036] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Gavin Kistner" <gavin.kistner@...> 2008/03/26

From: Dave Thomas [mailto:dave@pragprog.com]
[#16038] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/26

Hi,
[#16040] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Gavin Kistner" <gavin.kistner@...> 2008/03/26

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org]
[#16039] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/03/26

Gabon:
[#16028] Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/03/26

HI,

[#16009] (Somewhat) undocumented Change in Ruby 1.9: Module#constants returns Symbols instead of Strings — Florian Gilcher <flo@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2008/03/25
[#16019] Re: (Somewhat) undocumented Change in Ruby 1.9: Module#constants returns Symbols instead of Strings — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/26

Hi,

[#16010] #defined? — ts <decoux@...>

3 messages 2008/03/25
[#16376] Re: #defined? — ts <decoux@...> 2008/04/13

ts wrote:
[#16382] Re: #defined? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/04/14

Hi,

[#16011] New ERb mode — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...>

Hi folks,

11 messages 2008/03/25
[#16012] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/03/25

On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Marc Haisenko wrote:
[#16013] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — "Jason Roelofs" <jameskilton@...> 2008/03/25

ERb already does this:
[#16014] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/03/25

On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Jason Roelofs wrote:
[#16015] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — "Jason Roelofs" <jameskilton@...> 2008/03/25

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Marc Haisenko <haisenko@comdasys.com> wrote:
[#16016] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/03/25

On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Jason Roelofs wrote:
[#16017] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/25

Marc Haisenko wrote:
[#16020] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/03/26

On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Phlip wrote:
[#16021] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/03/26

Marc Haisenko wrote:
[#16022] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/03/26

On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Phlip wrote:
[#16054] Re: [PATCH] New ERb mode — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2008/03/28

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#16023] some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Chris Shea <cmshea@...>

All,

10 messages 2008/03/26
[#16037] Re: some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/26

Hi,
[#16047] Re: some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/27

Hi,
[#16049] Re: some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/27

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:26:51PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16068] Re: some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/29

Hi,
[#16086] Re: some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/03/31

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16087] Re: some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/03/31

Hi,
[#16103] Re: some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/04/01

On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:27:51AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16109] Re: some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/04/02

Hi,
[#16048] Re: some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — ts <decoux@...> 2008/03/27

>>>>> "N" == Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#16051] REXML in 1.8.6 p114 — "Michael Klishin" <michael.s.klishin.lists@...>

In REXML in 1.8.6 p114 call site to

2 messages 2008/03/27
[#16332] Re: REXML in 1.8.6 p114 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2008/04/11

On Thursday 27 March 2008, Michael Klishin wrote:

[#16057] About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — "XiaoLiang Liu" <liuxlsh@...>

Hello everyone,

7 messages 2008/03/28
[#16083] Re: About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — "XiaoLiang Liu" <liuxlsh@...> 2008/03/31

Can anyone help me on this?
[#16084] Re: About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/03/31

I'd read it like this: freeware means no license attached.
[#16091] Re: About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — Corey Jewett <ml@...> 2008/03/31

[#16095] Re: About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — James Tucker <jftucker@...> 2008/04/01

[#16096] Re: About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — "XiaoLiang Liu" <liuxlsh@...> 2008/04/01

Thank you very much for your info :-)
[#16085] Re: About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/03/31

On Monday 31 March 2008, XiaoLiang Liu wrote:

[#16058] Re: Why Ruby do not optimize code at all? — "Jason Roelofs" <jameskilton@...>

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@gmail.com> wrote:

2 messages 2008/03/28
[#16059] Re: Why Ruby do not optimize code at all? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/03/28

We can redefine Fixnum#* in Ruby.

[#16063] CI notifications (again) for good of RubySpec — "Michael Klishin" <michael.s.klishin.lists@...>

I know CI topic is a sea sailed for ruby-core but anyway. Spec suite

1 message 2008/03/28

[#16064] CI notifications (again) for good of RubySpec — "Michael Klishin" <michael.s.klishin.lists@...>

I know CI topic is a sea sailed for ruby-core but anyway. Spec suite

1 message 2008/03/28

[#16065] re-entrant ruby_exec() or ruby_run_node() ? — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2008/03/29
[#16072] Re: re-entrant ruby_exec() or ruby_run_node() ? — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/29

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:

[#16071] expose ruby_init_gems() in <ruby.h> for Ruby 1.9 — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>

Hello,

1 message 2008/03/29

[#16073] Has Rational.new! intentionally been made private? — "Philip Ross" <phil.ross@...>

The recent changes to implement Rational as a built-in C class have

3 messages 2008/03/30
[#16075] Re: Has Rational.new! intentionally been made private? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/03/30

Philip Ross wrote:
[#16076] Re: Has Rational.new! intentionally been made private? — Philip Ross <phil.ross@...> 2008/03/30

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

[#16077] String#dump vs String#inspect — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2008/03/30
[#16081] Re: String#dump vs String#inspect — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/03/31

Hi,

[#16078] C extension - how to print exception like Ruby? — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2008/03/30
[#16079] Re: C extension - how to print exception like Ruby? — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/03/30

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:

[#16080] Latest Ruby 1.9 SVN Head - Make check loop — Tommy Nordgren <tommy.nordgren@...>

There appears to be an infinite loop in Make check with the latest svn

1 message 2008/03/30

[#16082] The future of VM::InstructionSequence — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

A while back in The future of

1 message 2008/03/31

[#16088] command_call in parse.y — Adrian Thurston <thurston@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2008/03/31
[#16092] Re: command_call in parse.y — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/03/31

On Mar 31, 2008, at 14:50 PM, Adrian Thurston wrote:
[#16108] Re: command_call in parse.y — Adrian Thurston <thurston@...> 2008/04/01

Thanks. It would be really nice if I could make use of that test suite.
[#16113] Re: command_call in parse.y — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/04/02

[#16089] Re: command_call in parse.y — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/31

Hi,
[#16090] Re: command_call in parse.y — Adrian Thurston <thurston@...> 2008/03/31

Ah, I see the ambiguity that would create.

Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release

From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Date: 2008-03-24 12:05:11 UTC
List: ruby-core #16003 
At Sat, 22 Mar 2008 01:43:50 +0900,
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> It might be helpful if you went over the tracker list and make note of which
> things are deferred and which are not. Specifically I'm interested in #18722
> (trace hook getting called after expression evaluation ) also mentioned in
> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/145818

It has been handled, thanks.

By the way, bug fixes are not included in the feature requests here.
I am not going to set a dead-line on bug-fix requests any time soon.
Feel free to point out any time, do not hesitate to take advantage of
the release engineering period for getting bugs fixed.  That is
exactly what it is for! :)

Regards,

--
Akinori MUSHA / http://akinori.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next