From: Sam Ruby <rubys@...>
Date: 2008-03-24T10:54:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Bugs in REXML

Federico Builes wrote:
> On 3/23/08, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
>> No, sorry, not at all. The XML declaration is part of well-formedness,
>>  not validity. So is the number and place of document type declarations
>>  or similar stuff. If REXML gets this wrong, it should be fixed asap.
> 
> I've attached a bug fix for this in the tracker:
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=19058&group_id=426&atid=1698
> 
> Also, while writing REXML's spec for Rubinius I've found some other
> minor problems, I've attached fixes for them too:
> 
> * Fix for get_attribute in REXML::Attribute -
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=19039&group_id=426&atid=1698
> 
> * Fix for standalone's default value in XMLDecl -
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=19032&group_id=426&atid=1698
> 
> * Docfix for Document -
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=19038&group_id=426&atid=1698

Please don't take this as being ungrateful, but in order to prevent 
future regressions, any chance that test cases for the issues that these 
fixes address can be added?

- Sam Ruby