[#15701] Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#15704] Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — Lin Jen-Shin <godfat@...>
Proc#curry doesn't work on function which produces function,
Hi,
>>>>> "Y" == Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> writes:
[#15707] Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi, developers,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:58:00PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
Hi,
At Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:16:54 +0900,
At Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:39:45 +0900,
[#15709] capitalize and downcase — Trans <transfire@...>
I've always wondered why String#capitalize downcases the whole string
[#15713] Ruby String hash key overflow when converting to Fixnum. — "Chiyuan Zhang" <pluskid@...>
Hi, all! I've opened a issue at rubyforge:
[#15728] Question on build process - skipping unsupported extensions — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Hi,
[#15740] Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Hi.
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi.
Hongli Lai wrote:
Hi.
Hi,
I believe I managed to close the performance gap to only 6% slower than
Daniel DeLorme wrote:
[#15746] Am I misinterpreting the new keyword arguments to IO.foreach and friends? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I was expecting this to pass lines to the block:
[#15756] embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
Hello,
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15775] next(n), succ(n) ? — Trans <transfire@...>
Can anyone see any reason against adding an optional parameter to
[#15778] Named captures and regular captures — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
It seems that once you have a named capture in a regular expression,
[#15783] Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
Daniel Berger wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:52:40AM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#15835] TimeoutError in core, timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...>
I've been reworking JRuby's stdlib to improve performance and fix
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 12:13 +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#15837] Correct procedure for patch review? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Hi.
[#15855] Ruby 1.8.6 trace return line numbers wrong — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
Consider this program:
[#15860] Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — Jos Backus <jos@...>
DSecRG Advisory #DSECRG-08-026 aka -018 describes a remote directory traversal
[#15871] Sparc architecture optimizations — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>
Someone at Sun has been looking at Ruby on Sparc:
Thomas Enebo wrote:
Hello Ruby-core,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Prashant Srinivasan wrote:
[#15880] Ruby 1.8.6 binding value after "if" expression evaluation — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
Here's another trace hook weirdness that I've encountered.
Hello,
Thanks. The output you report matches what I get in 1.8.6 and suggests where
I think I've found why this is happening. The trace hook for NODE_IF is
[#15907] Range#member? semantics seem wrong — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Range#member? has been changed so that it the start and end of the
[#15909] RARRAY_PTR — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>
Hi,
[#15917] Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Ruby 1.9 (trunk) seems to crash when running the supplied RubyGems and Rake:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 06:53:19PM +0900, Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15927] how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
This works in Ruby (1.9):
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#15933] complex and rational — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Before I start doing the documentation for the PickAxe, could I just
[#15936] Are Depreciated Methods "add_final" & "remove_final" supposed to ACTUALLY WORK? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
In Working on IRHG Docs for GC the following
>>>>> "C" == Charles Thornton <ceo@hawthorne-press.com> writes:
ts wrote:
[#15938] Questions on Enumerator#skip_first and Enumerable#first — "Artem Voroztsov" <artem.voroztsov@...>
I asked in ruby-talk, but did not get answer.
On Mar 18, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Artem Voroztsov wrote:
[#15975] Bugs in REXML — "Federico Builes" <federico.builes@...>
Hi,
On Mar 21, 2008, at 17:35, Federico Builes wrote:
[#15980] 1.8.6 memory leak? — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...>
Hi,
[#15983] Changing the algorithm of String#* — apeiros <apeiros@...>
Hi there
[#15990] Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
Hi Dave,
Hi Dave,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave,
This is all a semantic problem. Different people have different
[#16011] New ERb mode — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...>
Hi folks,
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Marc Haisenko wrote:
ERb already does this:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Jason Roelofs wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Marc Haisenko <haisenko@comdasys.com> wro=
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Jason Roelofs wrote:
[#16023] some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Chris Shea <cmshea@...>
All,
Hi,
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:26:51PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#16057] About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — "XiaoLiang Liu" <liuxlsh@...>
Hello everyone,
[#16088] command_call in parse.y — Adrian Thurston <thurston@...>
Hi,
embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread
Hello,
I am using ruby 1.9.0 (2007-12-25 revision 14709) [i686-linux].
I'm having trouble embedding Ruby inside a pthread because calling
ruby_sysinit() is segfaulting. I created a small example to reproduce
the problem and illustrate my humble goal.
There are three files in this example:
$ ls
extconf.rb hello.rb main.c
First, we have a simple Ruby script:
$ cat hello.rb
puts "Hello World!"
Second, we have a Makefile generator:
$ cat extconf.rb
require 'mkmf'
have_library('pthread', 'pthread_create')
have_library('ruby', 'ruby_init') ||
have_library('ruby-static', 'ruby_init')
create_makefile('main')
Finally, we have a C program:
$ cat main.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <ruby.h>
RUBY_GLOBAL_SETUP
pthread_t gRubyThread;
pthread_mutex_t gCProgLock;
void* gRubyThread_body(void* dummy)
{
int fake_argc = 0;
char* fake_argv[1];
printf("Ruby thread is calling ruby_sysinit()\n");
ruby_sysinit(&fake_argc, &fake_argv);
{
printf("Ruby thread is calling RUBY_INIT_STACK()\n");
RUBY_INIT_STACK;
printf("Ruby thread is calling ruby_init()\n");
ruby_init();
char* file = "hello.rb"; // the file to run
printf("Ruby interpreter is loading file: %s\n", file);
void* node = rb_load_file(file);
printf("Ruby thread is starting interpreter\n");
ruby_run_node(node);
}
printf("Ruby thread is done, waking up C program...\n");
pthread_mutex_unlock(&gCProgLock);
return NULL;
}
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
pthread_mutex_init(&gCProgLock, NULL);
pthread_mutex_lock(&gCProgLock);
printf("C program is putting Ruby thread in control...\n");
pthread_create(&gRubyThread, NULL, gRubyThread_body, NULL);
pthread_mutex_lock(&gCProgLock); // C program blocks here
printf("C program is back in control, exiting...\n");
return 0;
}
This C program is very simple: it creates a new pthread and locks
itself. (At this point, only the pthread in running.) The pthread then
proceeds to embed a Ruby 1.9 interpreter inside itself and have the
interpreter run the "hello.rb" file. Once this is complete, the pthread
unlocks the main C program and dies. Finally, the main C program exits.
I should clarify that although the main.c in this example has argc and
argv, when I deploy my C extension as a .so file, I do not have any
access to the main() method of the C program.
For this reason, I did not pass the argc and argv from main() to the
body of the gRubyThread (because that is the real-life scenario of this
simple example). And since ruby_sysinit() requires an argc and argv, I
was forced to fabricate them inside the body of gRubyThread.
Now let's try running this example.
Generate the makefile:
$ ruby extconf.rb
checking for pthread_create() in -lpthread... yes
checking for ruby_init() in -lruby... no
checking for ruby_init() in -lruby-static... yes
creating Makefile
Build the C extension:
$ make
gcc -I. -I/home/sun/app/ruby19/include/ruby-1.9.0/i686-linux
-I/home/sun/app/ruby19/include/ruby-1.9.0 -I. -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-fPIC -g -O2 -o main.o -c main.c
main.c: In function 'gRubyThread_body':
main.c:16: warning: passing argument 2 of 'ruby_sysinit' from
incompatible pointer type
gcc -shared -o main.so main.o -L. -L/home/sun/app/ruby19/lib
-Wl,-R/home/sun/app/ruby19/lib -L. -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic
-lruby-static -lpthread -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lcrypt -lm -lc
Copy and paste the last gcc command from the output above.
Then remove the "-shared" option. And run the new command:
$ gcc -o main.so main.o -L. -L/home/sun/app/ruby19/lib
-Wl,-R/home/sun/app/ruby19/lib -L. -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic
-lruby-static -lpthread -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lcrypt -lm -lc
Now run the C program:
$ ./main.so
C program is putting Ruby thread in control...
Ruby thread is calling ruby_sysinit()
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
As you can see, ruby_sysinit() core dumped on us. Why?
Thanks for your consideration.