[#15701] Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#15704] Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — Lin Jen-Shin <godfat@...>
Proc#curry doesn't work on function which produces function,
Hi,
>>>>> "Y" == Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> writes:
[#15707] Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi, developers,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:58:00PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
Hi,
At Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:16:54 +0900,
At Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:39:45 +0900,
[#15709] capitalize and downcase — Trans <transfire@...>
I've always wondered why String#capitalize downcases the whole string
[#15713] Ruby String hash key overflow when converting to Fixnum. — "Chiyuan Zhang" <pluskid@...>
Hi, all! I've opened a issue at rubyforge:
[#15728] Question on build process - skipping unsupported extensions — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Hi,
[#15740] Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Hi.
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi.
Hongli Lai wrote:
Hi.
Hi,
I believe I managed to close the performance gap to only 6% slower than
Daniel DeLorme wrote:
[#15746] Am I misinterpreting the new keyword arguments to IO.foreach and friends? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I was expecting this to pass lines to the block:
[#15756] embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
Hello,
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15775] next(n), succ(n) ? — Trans <transfire@...>
Can anyone see any reason against adding an optional parameter to
[#15778] Named captures and regular captures — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
It seems that once you have a named capture in a regular expression,
[#15783] Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
Daniel Berger wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:52:40AM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#15835] TimeoutError in core, timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...>
I've been reworking JRuby's stdlib to improve performance and fix
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 12:13 +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#15837] Correct procedure for patch review? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Hi.
[#15855] Ruby 1.8.6 trace return line numbers wrong — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
Consider this program:
[#15860] Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — Jos Backus <jos@...>
DSecRG Advisory #DSECRG-08-026 aka -018 describes a remote directory traversal
[#15871] Sparc architecture optimizations — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>
Someone at Sun has been looking at Ruby on Sparc:
Thomas Enebo wrote:
Hello Ruby-core,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Prashant Srinivasan wrote:
[#15880] Ruby 1.8.6 binding value after "if" expression evaluation — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
Here's another trace hook weirdness that I've encountered.
Hello,
Thanks. The output you report matches what I get in 1.8.6 and suggests where
I think I've found why this is happening. The trace hook for NODE_IF is
[#15907] Range#member? semantics seem wrong — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Range#member? has been changed so that it the start and end of the
[#15909] RARRAY_PTR — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>
Hi,
[#15917] Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Ruby 1.9 (trunk) seems to crash when running the supplied RubyGems and Rake:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 06:53:19PM +0900, Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15927] how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
This works in Ruby (1.9):
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#15933] complex and rational — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Before I start doing the documentation for the PickAxe, could I just
[#15936] Are Depreciated Methods "add_final" & "remove_final" supposed to ACTUALLY WORK? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
In Working on IRHG Docs for GC the following
>>>>> "C" == Charles Thornton <ceo@hawthorne-press.com> writes:
ts wrote:
[#15938] Questions on Enumerator#skip_first and Enumerable#first — "Artem Voroztsov" <artem.voroztsov@...>
I asked in ruby-talk, but did not get answer.
On Mar 18, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Artem Voroztsov wrote:
[#15975] Bugs in REXML — "Federico Builes" <federico.builes@...>
Hi,
On Mar 21, 2008, at 17:35, Federico Builes wrote:
[#15980] 1.8.6 memory leak? — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...>
Hi,
[#15983] Changing the algorithm of String#* — apeiros <apeiros@...>
Hi there
[#15990] Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
Hi Dave,
Hi Dave,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave,
This is all a semantic problem. Different people have different
[#16011] New ERb mode — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...>
Hi folks,
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Marc Haisenko wrote:
ERb already does this:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Jason Roelofs wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Marc Haisenko <haisenko@comdasys.com> wro=
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Jason Roelofs wrote:
[#16023] some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Chris Shea <cmshea@...>
All,
Hi,
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:26:51PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#16057] About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — "XiaoLiang Liu" <liuxlsh@...>
Hello everyone,
[#16088] command_call in parse.y — Adrian Thurston <thurston@...>
Hi,
Re: embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> At Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:57:36 +0900,
> Suraj N. Kurapati wrote in [ruby-core:15767]:
>> [1..2]
Thanks for the explanations.
>> 3. Is it safe to "compile" the hello.rb file into a NODE in the main
>> thread and then execute it inside a child thread? Will there be any
>> cross-thread violations by doing this?
>
> I guess safe.
I certainly hope so! :-)
> Your example does create new thread outside of ruby, the
> interpreter doesn't know about the thread. You should use
> rb_thread_create() instead.
I tried your suggestion, but it did not work very well for me (see
below). Perhaps I wrote a poor implementation?
Here is the new C program, revised according to your suggestion:
$ cat main.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <ruby.h>
// aRubyProgram:: program node for the interpreter to run
VALUE the_ruby_thread(void* aRubyProgram)
{
printf("Ruby thread is starting interpreter\n");
ruby_run_node(aRubyProgram);
printf("Ruby thread is done...\n");
return Qtrue;
}
RUBY_GLOBAL_SETUP
void the_c_program()
{
char* file = "hello.rb"; // the file to run
int fake_argc = 2;
char* fake_args[fake_argc];
fake_args[0] = "ruby";
fake_args[1] = file;
char** fake_argv = fake_args;
printf("C program is calling ruby_sysinit()\n");
ruby_sysinit(&fake_argc, &fake_argv);
printf("C program is calling RUBY_INIT_STACK()\n");
RUBY_INIT_STACK;
printf("C program is calling ruby_init()\n");
ruby_init();
printf("C program is calling ruby_init_loadpath()\n");
ruby_init_loadpath();
printf("C program is loading file: %s\n", file);
void* rubyProgram = ruby_options(fake_argc, fake_argv);
printf("C program is putting Ruby thread in control...\n");
rb_thread_create(the_ruby_thread, rubyProgram);
rb_thread_schedule();
printf("C program is back in control, exiting...\n");
}
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
the_c_program();
return 0;
}
With hello.rb as:
$ cat hello.rb
puts "Hello World!"
require 'rubygems'
puts "rubygems OK!"
The result of the C program is:
$ ./main.so
[BUG] rb_thread_terminate_all: called by child thread (0x8170160,
0x81bea60)
ruby 1.9.0 (2007-12-25 revision 14709) [i686-linux]
-- control frame ----------
c:0001 p:---- s:0002 b:0002 l:000001 d:000001 TOP
---------------------------
-- backtrace of native function call (Use addr2line) --
0x80f0e0a
0x810ed0c
0x810ed7b
0x80f3a75
0x8060ab2
0x8060b62
0x805a93b
0x80f4a3e
0x80f4ac1
0xb7f5c46b
0xb7e7f6de
-------------------------------------------------------
C program is calling ruby_sysinit()
C program is calling RUBY_INIT_STACK()
C program is calling ruby_init()
C program is calling ruby_init_loadpath()
C program is loading file: hello.rb
C program is putting Ruby thread in control...
Ruby thread is starting interpreter
However, with hello.rb as:
$ cat hello.rb
puts "Hello World!"
require 'rubygems'
puts "rubygems OK!"
print 'Ruby is waiting... '
sleep 3
puts 'done!'
The result of the C program is:
$ ./main.so
C program is calling ruby_sysinit()
C program is calling RUBY_INIT_STACK()
C program is calling ruby_init()
C program is calling ruby_init_loadpath()
C program is loading file: hello.rb
C program is putting Ruby thread in control...
Ruby thread is starting interpreter
C program is back in control, exiting...
Notice that the C program did not wait for the_ruby_thread() to
finish. Is there a function in the ruby C API that allows me to
wait for a child thread to finish (not rb_thread_join)?
I cannot simply join the child thread because in the real-world
application of this example, I need to repeatedly transfer control
from the main C program to the child thread about 30_000 times.
Thanks for your consideration.