From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2008-03-27T01:22:43+09:00
Subject: Re: Recent changes in Range#step behavior


On Mar 26, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> The rest should be discussed.  I had a reason for the behavior, but
> I now feel that Range#step should be compatible with Numeric#step if
> the edge values are numeric.

Can we reopen the member? discussion too? I honestly feel that the  
name implies set membership, so

(1..3).member?(2.5)

should, I believe, be false, as 1..3 is the set of integers from 1 to 3.


Dave