[#15701] Ruby 1.9.0-1 snapshot released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#15704] Proc#curry doesn't work on func which produces func — Lin Jen-Shin <godfat@...>
Proc#curry doesn't work on function which produces function,
Hi,
>>>>> "Y" == Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> writes:
[#15707] Schedule for the 1.8.7 release — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi, developers,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:58:00PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
Hi,
At Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:16:54 +0900,
At Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:39:45 +0900,
[#15709] capitalize and downcase — Trans <transfire@...>
I've always wondered why String#capitalize downcases the whole string
[#15713] Ruby String hash key overflow when converting to Fixnum. — "Chiyuan Zhang" <pluskid@...>
Hi, all! I've opened a issue at rubyforge:
[#15728] Question on build process - skipping unsupported extensions — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Hi,
[#15740] Copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Hi.
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi.
Hongli Lai wrote:
Hi.
Hi,
I believe I managed to close the performance gap to only 6% slower than
Daniel DeLorme wrote:
[#15746] Am I misinterpreting the new keyword arguments to IO.foreach and friends? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I was expecting this to pass lines to the block:
[#15756] embedding Ruby 1.9.0 inside pthread — "Suraj Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
Hello,
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15775] next(n), succ(n) ? — Trans <transfire@...>
Can anyone see any reason against adding an optional parameter to
[#15778] Named captures and regular captures — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
It seems that once you have a named capture in a regular expression,
[#15783] Adding startup and shutdown to Test::Unit — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
Daniel Berger wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:52:40AM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#15835] TimeoutError in core, timeouts for ConditionVariable#wait — MenTaLguY <mental@...>
I've been reworking JRuby's stdlib to improve performance and fix
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 12:13 +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:
[#15837] Correct procedure for patch review? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Hi.
[#15855] Ruby 1.8.6 trace return line numbers wrong — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
Consider this program:
[#15860] Webrick directory traversal exploit on UNIX — Jos Backus <jos@...>
DSecRG Advisory #DSECRG-08-026 aka -018 describes a remote directory traversal
[#15871] Sparc architecture optimizations — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>
Someone at Sun has been looking at Ruby on Sparc:
Thomas Enebo wrote:
Hello Ruby-core,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Prashant Srinivasan wrote:
[#15880] Ruby 1.8.6 binding value after "if" expression evaluation — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
Here's another trace hook weirdness that I've encountered.
Hello,
Thanks. The output you report matches what I get in 1.8.6 and suggests where
I think I've found why this is happening. The trace hook for NODE_IF is
[#15907] Range#member? semantics seem wrong — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Range#member? has been changed so that it the start and end of the
[#15909] RARRAY_PTR — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>
Hi,
[#15917] Ruby 1.9 (trunk) crashes when running RubyGems and Rake — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>
Ruby 1.9 (trunk) seems to crash when running the supplied RubyGems and Rake:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 06:53:19PM +0900, Hongli Lai wrote:
[#15927] how to create a block with a block parameter in C? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
This works in Ruby (1.9):
>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:
[#15933] complex and rational — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Before I start doing the documentation for the PickAxe, could I just
[#15936] Are Depreciated Methods "add_final" & "remove_final" supposed to ACTUALLY WORK? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
In Working on IRHG Docs for GC the following
>>>>> "C" == Charles Thornton <ceo@hawthorne-press.com> writes:
ts wrote:
[#15938] Questions on Enumerator#skip_first and Enumerable#first — "Artem Voroztsov" <artem.voroztsov@...>
I asked in ruby-talk, but did not get answer.
On Mar 18, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Artem Voroztsov wrote:
[#15975] Bugs in REXML — "Federico Builes" <federico.builes@...>
Hi,
On Mar 21, 2008, at 17:35, Federico Builes wrote:
[#15980] 1.8.6 memory leak? — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...>
Hi,
[#15983] Changing the algorithm of String#* — apeiros <apeiros@...>
Hi there
[#15990] Recent changes in Range#step behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
Hi Dave,
Hi Dave,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave,
This is all a semantic problem. Different people have different
[#16011] New ERb mode — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...>
Hi folks,
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Marc Haisenko wrote:
ERb already does this:
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Jason Roelofs wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Marc Haisenko <haisenko@comdasys.com> wro=
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Jason Roelofs wrote:
[#16023] some Enumerable methods slower in 1.9 on OS X after revision 15124 — Chris Shea <cmshea@...>
All,
Hi,
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:26:51PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#16057] About the license of gserver.rb being "freeware"? — "XiaoLiang Liu" <liuxlsh@...>
Hello everyone,
[#16088] command_call in parse.y — Adrian Thurston <thurston@...>
Hi,
Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release
I'm a little confused with what you are asking, so let me try to summarize. I have two requests for the release so far. The first change request is a patch by Mauricio Fernandez. It has been applied to Ruby 1.9 although Mauricio also gave a patch for 1.8 and it is just as valid there. The second change request stems from an observation that in conditionals like "if", "while", or "until", a trace hook gets called twice for no good reason that I can tell. Originally I had thought there was a stop before the expression was evaluated and another after the expression was evaluated, but that is not the case. Here is an example: x=1 x=2 if x=3 If you debug this you will see that the values of x are 1 and 2 even though there is a stage in theory where x=3. I'm not sure what the intended behavior is supposed to be, but if it is to run the trace hook once, I think I could provide a patch for that. On Ruby 1.9 if you run the above program, I do not believe you do not get the duplicate call to the trace hook. Since Ruby 1.9 changes constantly, I could be wrong; so folks please double check. I have been using a patched debug.rb on 1.9 since the one I have installed on Ubuntu ruby 1.9.0(2007-08-30 patchlevel 0) [i486-linux] doesn't work. (No doubt this been subsequently fixed.) On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote: > Still packing.. > > At Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:41:23 -0500, > Rocky Bernstein wrote: > > comments in line. > > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi, developers, > > > > > > After seeing Ruby 1.9.0-1 released earlier today, I, as the release > > > manager of the 1.8 series, would like to announce here that it is time > > > to start working on the next release, 1.8.7. > > > > > > Below is the timeline I made up. The reason for the slow start (long > > > period for discussion) is because I'm going on a week's trip next week > > > to Portland and Seattle. > > > > > > Schedule for 1.8.7: (subject to change as it proceeds) > > > > > > Now - 2008-03-22 > > > Discuss what features should and/or can be backported, and get > > > the release manager to make decisions as to which features are > > > going to be worked on for 1.8.7. > > > > > > > In what forum are changes and features going to be discussed? ruby-core? > As > > Yes, ruby-core would be the best place to discuss in. > > > for issues, > > see http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/15231 > > > > Alas no comments/discussion. If you want me to work up a patch, let me > know. > > > > As for back-ports, I have the honor of submitting the first tracker > request > > :-) > > > > > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=18517&group_id=426&atid=22040 > > OK, I've read the thread and the patch looks fair. But, is what you > mean by "a patch" different than is attached to the request? > > -- > Akinori MUSHA / http://akinori.org/ >