[#3741] Re: Why it's quiet -- standard distribution issues — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I think it's the feature of the mailing list archive to create a threads of
[#3756] RE: XMP on comments — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> require "xmp"
[#3766] modulo and remainder — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3776] Kernel.rand — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
How about defining:
[#3781] Widening out discussions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3795] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> As matz said in [ruby-talk:3785] and Dave said in [ruby-talk:1229],
Hi, Aleksi,
[#3823] Re: Array.pick — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> > Just a general comment--a brief statement of purpose and using
[#3827] JRuby? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Is there or will there be Ruby equivalent of JPython?
[#3882] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> |look too strange, confusing, or cryptic. Maybe just @, $, %, &.
Hi,
[#3918] A question about variable names... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3935] If your company uses Pallets, Skids, Boxes, Lumber, etc. — pallets2@...
[#3956] Tk PhotoImage options — andy@... (Andrew Hunt)
Hi all,
[#3971] Thread and File do not work together — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
following example do not work correctly with my ruby
[#3986] Re: Principle of least effort -- another Ruby virtue. — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
> Principle of Least Effort.
Hi,
[#4005] Re: Pluggable functions and blocks — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Aleksi makes a question:
[#4008] Ruby installation instructions for Windows — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I had to write these instructions for my friends. I thought it might be nice
[#4043] What are you using Ruby for? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
On 15 Jul 2000 22:08:50 -0500,
Hi,
[#4057] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Johann:
[#4082] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
[#4091] 'each' and 'in' — hal9000@...
I just recently realized why the default
[#4107] Re: 'each' and 'in' -- special char problem? — schneik@...
[#4114] Method signature - a question for the group — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#4139] Facilitating Ruby self-propagation with the rig-it autopolymorph application. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4158] Getting Tk to work on Windows — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi....
[#4178] Partly converted English Ruby/Tk widget demo working. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4234] @ variables not updated within method? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
On 27 Jul 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#4267] Ruby.next, Perl6, Python 3000, Tcl++, etc. -- Any opportunities for common implementation code? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
"Conrad Schneiker" wrote:
[ruby-talk:04203] C# (Sharp) & .NET on comp.lang.python
Hi, Although this should probably be taken with a substantial grain of salt or two, this nevertheless had some interesting thought provoking ideas. Neil Hodgson wrote: > > Do you know where I can get information on Microsoft's IL? Thanks, > > As yet, there is no real documentation for IL. It is mentioned in several > reports on the current Microsoft Professional Developers Conference and in > some of the papers associated with the conference. > > A reasonably interesting document is from Bertrand Meyers + pals: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?URL=/library/techart/P > C_eiffel.htm "The aim of this project and the resulting products is to provide a full integration between ISE Eiffel and the Microsoft .NET Framework. The combined power of the platform and the development environment should yield the dream environment for building the powerful Internet applications that society expects from us today. Eiffel on the Microsoft .NET Framework provides flexibility, productivity, and high reliability. It is impossible, in particular, to overestimate the benefits of Design by Contract in a distributed environment, where looking for bugs after the fact can be an excruciating and money-wasting experience. Together with the other benefits of the Eiffel method耀eamless development, generic programming, information hiding and other software engineering principles, and a powerful inheritance mechanism勇iffel on the Microsoft .NET Framework provides a best-of-breed solution for ambitious Internet software developers." > """The core of the technology consists of a run time that interprets > and/or compiles byte code (the virtual machine's internal language, also > known as "IL") with metadata. The metadata describes each component part of > the system, including the prototype for all its methods, fields, or events. > """ > > One report at http://www.codeproject.com/ says """As all languages now > compile to the same result, performance for all languages from C# and VB to > Python and Eiffel will have exactly the same performance. """. I don't > really believe this as the different capabilities of the different languages > will lead to different performance. Hoever, as all languages will be using > some common substrate code for features like memory management and exception > handling, performance levels for the different languages will be closer than > before. > > The highlight of the conference output for me was this ASP code: > > <%@ page language="COBOL" %> > <script runat="server"> > OBJECT. > DATA DIVISION. > WORKING-STORAGE SECTION. > 77 FONT-SIZE PIC S9(9) COMP-5. > END OBJECT. > </script> > <% PERFORM VARYING FONT-SIZE FROM 1 BY 1 UNTIL FONT-SIZE > 7 %> > <font size="<%=FONT-SIZE%>"> Hello COBOL world! </font> <br> > <% END-PERFORM. %> Hmm. What's this!? Had enough sleep, so that's not the explanation. Oh-oh. Is this the _real_ Y2K problem? :-) -- Conrad Schneiker (This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)