[#3741] Re: Why it's quiet -- standard distribution issues — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I think it's the feature of the mailing list archive to create a threads of
[#3756] RE: XMP on comments — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> require "xmp"
[#3766] modulo and remainder — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3776] Kernel.rand — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
How about defining:
[#3781] Widening out discussions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3795] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> As matz said in [ruby-talk:3785] and Dave said in [ruby-talk:1229],
Hi, Aleksi,
[#3823] Re: Array.pick — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> > Just a general comment--a brief statement of purpose and using
[#3827] JRuby? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Is there or will there be Ruby equivalent of JPython?
[#3882] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> |look too strange, confusing, or cryptic. Maybe just @, $, %, &.
Hi,
[#3918] A question about variable names... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3935] If your company uses Pallets, Skids, Boxes, Lumber, etc. — pallets2@...
[#3956] Tk PhotoImage options — andy@... (Andrew Hunt)
Hi all,
[#3971] Thread and File do not work together — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
following example do not work correctly with my ruby
[#3986] Re: Principle of least effort -- another Ruby virtue. — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
> Principle of Least Effort.
Hi,
[#4005] Re: Pluggable functions and blocks — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Aleksi makes a question:
[#4008] Ruby installation instructions for Windows — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I had to write these instructions for my friends. I thought it might be nice
[#4043] What are you using Ruby for? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
On 15 Jul 2000 22:08:50 -0500,
Hi,
[#4057] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Johann:
[#4082] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
[#4091] 'each' and 'in' — hal9000@...
I just recently realized why the default
[#4107] Re: 'each' and 'in' -- special char problem? — schneik@...
[#4114] Method signature - a question for the group — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#4139] Facilitating Ruby self-propagation with the rig-it autopolymorph application. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4158] Getting Tk to work on Windows — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi....
[#4178] Partly converted English Ruby/Tk widget demo working. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4234] @ variables not updated within method? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
On 27 Jul 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#4267] Ruby.next, Perl6, Python 3000, Tcl++, etc. -- Any opportunities for common implementation code? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
"Conrad Schneiker" wrote:
[ruby-talk:04139] Facilitating Ruby self-propagation with the rig-it autopolymorph application.
Hi, Somewhat in the spirit of Hal's self-replicating Ruby programs, I've been thinking for some time about what sort of Ruby application would facilitate the multiplicative propagation of Ruby. The primary/initial target audience for this application is the huge pool of intermediate Perl users who would like a better programming language, and whose first practical workplace hurdle will be demonstrating that they can quickly get Ruby doing useful stuff. Moreover, I would like it to be possible to develop such a Ruby application in the near-to-medium term on a part time basis, and in such a way that even its prototype would be immediately useful for such candidate Ruby newcomers. This rules out big projects like IDEs and such. But I think some sort of cross between the Tk widget demo and a system configuration GUI/shell that is highly modification-friendly might fit the bill. What I have in mind is RIG-IT, the Ruby's Integrating GUI-based Innovator's Toolkit. (Although the program name is rigit, I write it rig-it to reflect its intended pronunciation, which in turn reflects the intended purpose of helping new users to rapidly rig up useful tasks to demonstrate the utility of Ruby to their co-workers and managers) The idea of rig-it is to provide an interface to let users view, run, copy, clone, and customize lots of useful code examples (i.e. the same sort of stuff that I was thinking of putting into the Ruby Cookbook FAQ, if I ever got around to it). Think of rig-it as an executable demo FAQ that is designed and commented to help you to easily customize it for your own purposes. This same framework could also serve as a hybrid GUI/shell for launching user programs/scripts. By judiciously modifying rig-it itself (or another copy thereof), many fairly mundane but common sorts of programming/scripting tasks could readily be developed, with a tolerable GUI for their non-programming end-user clients to use. Any thoughts or comments? (By the way, where is the Ruby version of the Tk widget demo? Guess why I asked about this previously.) -- Conrad Schneiker (This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)