[#3741] Re: Why it's quiet -- standard distribution issues — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I think it's the feature of the mailing list archive to create a threads of
9 messages
2000/07/01
[#3756] RE: XMP on comments — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> require "xmp"
1 message
2000/07/03
[#3766] modulo and remainder — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
8 messages
2000/07/03
[#3776] Kernel.rand — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
How about defining:
7 messages
2000/07/03
[#3781] Widening out discussions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
9 messages
2000/07/04
[#3795] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> As matz said in [ruby-talk:3785] and Dave said in [ruby-talk:1229],
11 messages
2000/07/04
[#3825] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil
— "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>
2000/07/05
Hi, Aleksi,
[#3823] Re: Array.pick — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> > Just a general comment--a brief statement of purpose and using
4 messages
2000/07/05
[#3827] JRuby? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Is there or will there be Ruby equivalent of JPython?
8 messages
2000/07/05
[#3882] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> |look too strange, confusing, or cryptic. Maybe just @, $, %, &.
6 messages
2000/07/06
[#3890] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/07/07
Hi,
[#3918] A question about variable names... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/07/10
[#3935] If your company uses Pallets, Skids, Boxes, Lumber, etc. — pallets2@...
1 message
2000/07/11
[#3956] Tk PhotoImage options — andy@... (Andrew Hunt)
Hi all,
6 messages
2000/07/13
[#3971] Thread and File do not work together — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
following example do not work correctly with my ruby
9 messages
2000/07/13
[#3986] Re: Principle of least effort -- another Ruby virtue. — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
> Principle of Least Effort.
14 messages
2000/07/14
[#3988] Re: Principle of least effort -- another Ruby virtue.
— Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
2000/07/14
Hi,
[#4005] Re: Pluggable functions and blocks — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Aleksi makes a question:
6 messages
2000/07/14
[#4008] Ruby installation instructions for Windows — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I had to write these instructions for my friends. I thought it might be nice
6 messages
2000/07/14
[#4043] What are you using Ruby for? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
16 messages
2000/07/16
[#4044] Re: What are you using Ruby for?
— "Kikutani, Makoto" <kikutani@...>
2000/07/16
On 15 Jul 2000 22:08:50 -0500,
[#4045] Re: What are you using Ruby for?
— "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>
2000/07/16
Hi,
[#4057] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Johann:
8 messages
2000/07/16
[#4082] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
11 messages
2000/07/17
[#4091] 'each' and 'in' — hal9000@...
I just recently realized why the default
3 messages
2000/07/17
[#4107] Re: 'each' and 'in' -- special char problem? — schneik@...
7 messages
2000/07/18
[#4114] Method signature - a question for the group — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
9 messages
2000/07/18
[#4139] Facilitating Ruby self-propagation with the rig-it autopolymorph application. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
11 messages
2000/07/20
[#4158] Getting Tk to work on Windows — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi....
2 messages
2000/07/21
[#4178] Partly converted English Ruby/Tk widget demo working. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
11 messages
2000/07/23
[#4234] @ variables not updated within method? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
12 messages
2000/07/27
[#4236] Re: @ variables not updated within method?
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/07/27
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
[#4248] TABWTDI and Hash.new([])
— Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
2000/07/28
On 27 Jul 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#4267] Ruby.next, Perl6, Python 3000, Tcl++, etc. -- Any opportunities for common implementation code? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2000/07/29
[#4269] Re: Ruby.next, Perl6, Python 3000, Tcl++, etc. -- Any opportunities for common implementation code?
— "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
2000/07/30
"Conrad Schneiker" wrote:
[ruby-talk:03852] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil
From:
matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date:
2000-07-06 02:55:43 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #3852
Hi,
In message "[ruby-talk:03851] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil"
on 00/07/06, "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@keynauts.com> writes:
|> Hmm, I thought I (we) came to the negative conclusion.
|Accoding Blade's nice looking threading view;
|http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/vframe.rb/ruby/ruby-dev/9052?9024-9551 ,
|I cannot find objection to [ruby-dev:9096] and [ruby-dev:9146].
|I thought that proposition could be accepted (for me, at least).
Didn't I raise objection? Well, perhaps I forgot to say my opinion.
|Nishi-san's proposition in [ruby-dev:9096]:
| String#gsub => create substituted string and returns it.
| String#gsub! => substitutes itself and returns self
| String#gsub!? => substitutes itself and returns if modification is done or not.
| String#gsub? => create substituted string and returns if modification is done or not. !?!?
I can agree with the possibility of the combination of modify/copy,
modified-or-unmodified-string/modified-string-or-nil. But I don't
feel '?' is a good name sign for it.
matz.