[#3741] Re: Why it's quiet -- standard distribution issues — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I think it's the feature of the mailing list archive to create a threads of
[#3756] RE: XMP on comments — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> require "xmp"
[#3766] modulo and remainder — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3776] Kernel.rand — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
How about defining:
[#3781] Widening out discussions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3795] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> As matz said in [ruby-talk:3785] and Dave said in [ruby-talk:1229],
Hi, Aleksi,
[#3823] Re: Array.pick — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> > Just a general comment--a brief statement of purpose and using
[#3827] JRuby? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Is there or will there be Ruby equivalent of JPython?
[#3882] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> |look too strange, confusing, or cryptic. Maybe just @, $, %, &.
Hi,
[#3918] A question about variable names... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3935] If your company uses Pallets, Skids, Boxes, Lumber, etc. — pallets2@...
[#3956] Tk PhotoImage options — andy@... (Andrew Hunt)
Hi all,
[#3971] Thread and File do not work together — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
following example do not work correctly with my ruby
[#3986] Re: Principle of least effort -- another Ruby virtue. — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
> Principle of Least Effort.
Hi,
[#4005] Re: Pluggable functions and blocks — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Aleksi makes a question:
[#4008] Ruby installation instructions for Windows — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I had to write these instructions for my friends. I thought it might be nice
[#4043] What are you using Ruby for? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
On 15 Jul 2000 22:08:50 -0500,
Hi,
[#4057] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Johann:
[#4082] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
[#4091] 'each' and 'in' — hal9000@...
I just recently realized why the default
[#4107] Re: 'each' and 'in' -- special char problem? — schneik@...
[#4114] Method signature - a question for the group — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#4139] Facilitating Ruby self-propagation with the rig-it autopolymorph application. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4158] Getting Tk to work on Windows — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi....
[#4178] Partly converted English Ruby/Tk widget demo working. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4234] @ variables not updated within method? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
On 27 Jul 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#4267] Ruby.next, Perl6, Python 3000, Tcl++, etc. -- Any opportunities for common implementation code? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
"Conrad Schneiker" wrote:
[ruby-talk:04134] Re: What are you using Ruby for?
Hi, Robert Feldt wrote: > The Ruby features I'd love to see / things I'd love to find out: > > * Being able to "freeze" an object and dump it to an exe that can be > executed stand-alone (without interpreter or external libs/exts) on a > non-Ruby aware machine. I distribute my jobs on a network of workstations > and it's not very nice to have to install Ruby on all of them prior to > execution. Is there any prospect for something like this in Ruby 1.7 or 1.8, but where the single exe file includes the interpreter and the needed libs? Sort of like perl2exe? (And with the same tolerable restrictions about not being able to eval in previously unmentioned libraries.) Although not glamorous, the mundane capability of easily creating a single file that can be run without installing other stuff would be a useful capability for increasing the utility and usage of Ruby. For instance, I know of some large departments of cutting-edge high-tech corporations (which I am not in any way presently associated with) that are open to distribution of Perl applications as standalone executables, but who for various reasons don't want people going around installing Perl on desktops, messing with servers, and so on. > * Anyone actually doing GUI stuff on Wintel machines? Didn't put much > effort into it, but I couldn't get TK to work... Given (1) that (AFAIK) the first "specialty" books for Perl and Python involved Tk, (2) that Perl has it's own Tk newsgroup, (3) that Tk is probably still the greatest GUI common denominator for open source languages, and (4) that there are probably about as many (if not more) users and developers on Wintel platforms at the moment as on all others combined, I think that it would be beneficial for Ruby if Tk on Windows were in better shape. (There may be something of a catch-22 here: if Rubywin/Tk were in good shape, it might attract more Perl/Tk and Python/Tkinter converts who could help maintain and improve it.) -- Conrad Schneiker (This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)