[#3741] Re: Why it's quiet -- standard distribution issues — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I think it's the feature of the mailing list archive to create a threads of
[#3756] RE: XMP on comments — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> require "xmp"
[#3766] modulo and remainder — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3776] Kernel.rand — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
How about defining:
[#3781] Widening out discussions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3795] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> As matz said in [ruby-talk:3785] and Dave said in [ruby-talk:1229],
Hi, Aleksi,
[#3823] Re: Array.pick — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> > Just a general comment--a brief statement of purpose and using
[#3827] JRuby? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Is there or will there be Ruby equivalent of JPython?
[#3882] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> |look too strange, confusing, or cryptic. Maybe just @, $, %, &.
Hi,
[#3918] A question about variable names... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3935] If your company uses Pallets, Skids, Boxes, Lumber, etc. — pallets2@...
[#3956] Tk PhotoImage options — andy@... (Andrew Hunt)
Hi all,
[#3971] Thread and File do not work together — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
following example do not work correctly with my ruby
[#3986] Re: Principle of least effort -- another Ruby virtue. — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
> Principle of Least Effort.
Hi,
[#4005] Re: Pluggable functions and blocks — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Aleksi makes a question:
[#4008] Ruby installation instructions for Windows — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I had to write these instructions for my friends. I thought it might be nice
[#4043] What are you using Ruby for? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
On 15 Jul 2000 22:08:50 -0500,
Hi,
[#4057] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Johann:
[#4082] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
[#4091] 'each' and 'in' — hal9000@...
I just recently realized why the default
[#4107] Re: 'each' and 'in' -- special char problem? — schneik@...
[#4114] Method signature - a question for the group — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#4139] Facilitating Ruby self-propagation with the rig-it autopolymorph application. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4158] Getting Tk to work on Windows — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi....
[#4178] Partly converted English Ruby/Tk widget demo working. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4234] @ variables not updated within method? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
On 27 Jul 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#4267] Ruby.next, Perl6, Python 3000, Tcl++, etc. -- Any opportunities for common implementation code? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
"Conrad Schneiker" wrote:
[ruby-talk:03940] Re: Brave GNU World feature about Ruby
Hi,
"Georg C. F. Greve" wrote:
> A reader suggested to write about Ruby in the Brave GNU World and
> after having a short look at the webpage this appears to be a good
> idea. Below you'll find the appended list of standard
> questions. Please fill them out as verbose as possible to give me the
> necessary insight into the project and send it back by mail.
As for the "What is it?" question, this is my latest (ongoing) revision from
the comp.lang.ruby newsgroup FAQ posting:
1.1 What is Ruby?
Ruby is a very high level, fully OO programming language. Indeed,
Ruby is one of the relatively few pure OO languages. Yet despite
its conceptual simplicity, Ruby is still a powerful and practical
"Industrial strength" development language.
Ruby selectively integrates many good ideas taken from Perl,
Python, Smalltalk, Eiffel, ADA, Clu, and Lisp. (Ruby is more
fully OO than Python in so far as basic types such as hashes can
be subclassed. See Ruby FAQ 1.4.)
In addition to common OO features, Ruby also has threads,
singleton methods, mix-ins, fully integrated closures and
iterators, plus proper meta-classes. Ruby is a relatively easy to
learn, easy to read, and easy to maintain language, yet it is very
powerful and sophisticated. Ruby has a true mark-and-sweep garbage
collector, which makes code more reliable and simplifies writing
extensions.
For many former Perl and Python users seeking a more uniform and
a more powerful set of higher level OO programming capabilities
without the complexities of C++, or the compromises of Java, or
the subtleties of Smalltalk, Ruby is a "much better Perl than
Perl" and a "significantly better Python than Python". (This is no
small feat, since these languages contributed some big innovations
to the field of development programming languages.)
Finally, Ruby is also an "open source" programming language. You
could characterize the Ruby philosophy as "there's a better way to
do it" (TABWTDI).
People doing GNU/Linux development work might also be interested to know
that there is an already usable Ruby/GTK+ module (which is still being
improved), and that there is also a Ruby/XML module makes it possible to use
Glade to develop Ruby/GTK+ GUIs.
Conrad