[#3741] Re: Why it's quiet -- standard distribution issues — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I think it's the feature of the mailing list archive to create a threads of
[#3756] RE: XMP on comments — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> require "xmp"
[#3766] modulo and remainder — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3776] Kernel.rand — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
How about defining:
[#3781] Widening out discussions — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3795] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> As matz said in [ruby-talk:3785] and Dave said in [ruby-talk:1229],
Hi, Aleksi,
[#3823] Re: Array.pick — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> > Just a general comment--a brief statement of purpose and using
[#3827] JRuby? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Is there or will there be Ruby equivalent of JPython?
[#3882] Re: Array.uniq! returning nil — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> |look too strange, confusing, or cryptic. Maybe just @, $, %, &.
Hi,
[#3918] A question about variable names... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#3935] If your company uses Pallets, Skids, Boxes, Lumber, etc. — pallets2@...
[#3956] Tk PhotoImage options — andy@... (Andrew Hunt)
Hi all,
[#3971] Thread and File do not work together — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
following example do not work correctly with my ruby
[#3986] Re: Principle of least effort -- another Ruby virtue. — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
> Principle of Least Effort.
Hi,
[#4005] Re: Pluggable functions and blocks — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Aleksi makes a question:
[#4008] Ruby installation instructions for Windows — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
I had to write these instructions for my friends. I thought it might be nice
[#4043] What are you using Ruby for? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
On 15 Jul 2000 22:08:50 -0500,
Hi,
[#4057] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Johann:
[#4082] Re: What are you using Ruby for? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
[#4091] 'each' and 'in' — hal9000@...
I just recently realized why the default
[#4107] Re: 'each' and 'in' -- special char problem? — schneik@...
[#4114] Method signature - a question for the group — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#4139] Facilitating Ruby self-propagation with the rig-it autopolymorph application. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4158] Getting Tk to work on Windows — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi....
[#4178] Partly converted English Ruby/Tk widget demo working. — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Hi,
[#4234] @ variables not updated within method? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
On 27 Jul 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#4267] Ruby.next, Perl6, Python 3000, Tcl++, etc. -- Any opportunities for common implementation code? — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Hi,
"Conrad Schneiker" wrote:
[ruby-talk:03885] Re: modulo and remainder
Hi, Judi Roy / Camile Hamel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yukihiro Matsumoto" <matz@netlab.co.jp> > To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp> > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 10:44 PM > Subject: [ruby-talk:03787] Re: modulo and remainder > > > Hi, > > > > In message "[ruby-talk:03779] Re: modulo and remainder" > > on 00/07/04, Tadayoshi Funaba <tadf@kt.rim.or.jp> writes: > > > > |I wrote a method jd_to_wday in date2.rb like this: > > | > > | def jd_to_wday(jd) (jd + 1) % 7 end > > | > > |It calculates the day of week of the given the Julian day number. > > |I used % and it must be modulo. So it works even if jd is -ve. > > > > > > > It reflects the author's weakpoint. Even if you don't need that > > (weakness in mathematical field?), I can't do the right thing without > > YOUR help. Enlighten me, please. > > > > matz. > > Hi, > > I'm very much a newbie programmer and don't pretend to be able to follow > most of the postings. > Am I right in assuming matz is looking for mathematical info on 'modulo' and > 'remainder' I'm somewhat puzzled about that. This was a fairly recent topic of discussion (within the last few weeks/months or so) where people presented a fair amount of information and argumentation on just this topic. I didn't realize that the implementation choice questions hadn't been settled. I was just reiterating a previously made remark from that discussion. -- Conrad Schneiker (This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)