[#6548] 1.8.4 p1, warning roundup — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#6552] Socket Documentation — zdennis <zdennis@...>
Attached is a patch against the latest socket.c in the ruby_1_8 branch. It covers all Socket
On 11/3/05, zdennis <zdennis@mktec.com> wrote:
Gavin Sinclair wrote:
zdennis wrote:
On 11/9/05, Zach Dennis <zdennis@mktec.com> wrote:
Hi.
[#6558] Method of feeding input to regexp matching — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>
I would very much like to be able to provide a Regexp object input from
[#6572] Stack trace consumes information. patch... — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I have just had output like this from rails:
[#6588] Object#clone missing documentation — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...>
It appears that Object#clone, unlike Object#dup, retains
Hi,
I've attached a documentation patch which tries to address this shortcoming.
Kev Jackson wrote:
[#6602] Re: Unpack Endian Bug — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#6604] Sandboxing without $SAFE — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
I've been playing with Ruby sandboxing alot over the past several
[#6619] Wildness: Purpose of NOEX_PUBLIC Flag in rb_add_method? — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
Several Different references to 'noex'
Charles E. Thornton wrote:
[#6625] Array::fill causes segfaults after many calls — noreply@...
Bugs item #2824, was opened at 2005-11-14 23:11
Hi,
[#6629] Strange error messages using DRb/TupleSpace — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Using
[#6636] alarming changes — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
[#6639] Tuple Class — TRANS <transfire@...>
If I put together a good Tuple class for Ruby could it go into core? I
[#6650] REXML Update Please — zdennis <zdennis@...>
I submitted this as an RCR, but I didn't know that RCR's aren't for the stdlib. Matz commented on
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#6660] Ruby on Neko ? — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...>
Hi folks,
Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
Florian Growrote:
Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@motion-twin.com> writes:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
[#6672] testing for hardlink with "test(?-, ...)" flawed on Windows — noreply@...
Bugs item #2858, was opened at 2005-11-20 16:35
Hi,
--- nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
[#6684] semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>
Hi all,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:22:59AM +0900, Stefan Kaes wrote:
Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Stefan Kaes wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
mathew wrote:
Stefan Kaes wrote:
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 12:31, Steven Jenkins wrote:
Hi --
>>>>> "m" == mathew <meta@pobox.com> writes:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Nov 21, 2005, at 9:37 PM, Stefan Kaes wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
URABE Shyouhei wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Stefan Kaes wrote:
Ara.T.Howard wrote:
Hi --
David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
David A. Black wrote:
Hi -
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 15:37, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Stefan Kaes wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#6721] String#index does not work correctly on SuSE10.0 x86_64 — "Kanis, Lars" <Kanis@...>
Hi folks,
[#6798] ruby 1.8.4 preview2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
On Nov 30, 2005, at 8:03 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> writes:
On Dec 4, 2005, at 4:07 AM, ts wrote:
>>>>> "E" == Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> writes:
On 11/30/05, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi.
Re: [RFC] Method of feeding input to regexp matching
Hi -- On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Nikolai Weibull wrote: > David A. Black wrote: > >> I'm thinking of cases like this: >> >> re = /abc.*def/ >> >> The first chunk out of the file might match this -- but then you'd >> have to keep going, really until EOF, to get the greedy match if it's >> there. Then you'd have to go back. > > Well, think of it like this instead. The Regexp simply reads from the > input source when it needs more data. The Regexp will concatenate the > new data with the old and continue on its matching routine. We build > the input as we go along, i.e., we’re in a sense dealing with > implementing lazy Strings. This won’t cause any issues with > backtracking, as the data will still be there. In the /abc.*def/ case, though, you'd always have to take all the input (at least up to the third-to-last character in the file), even if you had an intermediate match. So "needs more data" would not be something the regex could tell you. It would say, "Yes, there's a match", but you would have to know that the "yes" didn't mean you could stop. But if the regex were /abc.*?def/, then as soon as there was a "yes", you could stop. There's also a question of: if the first 4096 bytes started with "abc" and ended with "de", then you'd add the next 4096 -- but you'd have to perform the match again. Or else you'd have to know to rewind by exactly two characters. But if you're changing where you start the match, that could affect how anchors worked. Basically you'd have to get two state machines to talk to each other. Not to say it couldn't be done, but it seems to me there's are areas of impedance mismatch. David -- David A. Black dblack@wobblini.net