From: why the lucky stiff Date: 2005-11-11T08:50:03+09:00 Subject: Re: Sandboxing without $SAFE Eero Saynatkari wrote: > In general, this may be unnecessary work. If you run Ruby in a chrooted > environment with minimal tools and as an unprivileged user with all > proper permissions set, it is fairly safe. The failpoints, then, > would be any other applications in that chrooted environment, > accessed through system() and so on. Well, I'm trying to boil it down: require 'sandbox'. No other setup. But maybe it'd be nice to have a mode for chroot to give the freedom to access the filesystem given that the admin's got a safe uid and chroot. Thanks for the comment. _why